Search
Contact
Symbolbild für Änderung des Lieferkettengesetzes: Kleiderstange
03.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Supply Chain Act: reporting obligation no longer applies, sanctions reduced

In the coalition agreement, the coalition partners agreed to abolish the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) as part of the implementation of the European Supply Chain Directive CSDDD and to remove the reporting obligation of the LkSG beforehand. The latter is now happening: on September 3, 2025, the Federal Cabinet approved a corresponding amendment to the Supply Chain Act and presented a corresponding draft bill.

Removal of the reporting obligation has little practical impact

The deletion of the reporting obligation probably has little practical significance. The obligation arises from Section 10 LkSG. This currently still stipulates that companies with at least 1,000 employees in Germany must prepare an annual report on the fulfillment of due diligence obligations, submit it to the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA) and publish it on their website.

According to the draft law, the elimination of the report is expected to bring financial relief of 4.1 million euros for the German economy. Up to now, the BAFA had repeatedly suspended the reporting obligation, most recently until December 31, 2025.

Germany can also only temporarily remove the reporting obligation. This is because if, as things currently stand, the CSDDD has to be transposed into German law by July 2027, companies will probably have to submit a report again from the start of application of the new law. However, this can then be integrated into the sustainability report in accordance with the CSRD, if such a report is to be submitted.

The duties of care otherwise remain in place

With the exception of the reporting obligation, all previous due diligence obligations remain in place.

Companies will still need to establish a risk management system in all relevant business processes. They will still need to conduct annual and ad hoc risk assessments to identify risks in their own operations and with direct suppliers and adopt a policy statement on the company’s human rights strategy.

Preventive measures such as suitable procurement strategies, training and contractual assurances from direct suppliers are and remain important.

If risks or even violations of human rights or environmental obligations are identified, companies are obliged to take remedial action. Companies must also establish a complaints procedure and carry out risk analyses on an ad hoc basis to identify risks at indirect suppliers.

Sanctions only for serious violations

According to the cabinet’s decision, only serious violations of the LkSG will be sanctioned. Whereas previously almost every violation of the law, even formal ones, was an administrative offense, the draft law stipulates that fines will only be imposed for the following violations:

  • In relation to a human rights risk, a preventive measure is not taken or not taken in time.
  • In relation to a human rights risk, a remedial action is not taken or not taken in time.
  • In relation to a human rights risk, a remediation plan is not drawn up or not implemented in time or not implemented at all.
  • No complaints procedure will be set up.

This means that violations of environmental risks within the meaning of Section 2 (3) LkSG will no longer be sanctioned under the LkSG in future. However, the existing special statutory sanctions outside the LkSG will remain relevant. The amount of the impending fines is to remain unchanged. The draft bill will now be introduced into the legislative process.

The CSDDD extends the due diligence obligations

The EU member states must transpose the CSDDD into national law by July 26, 2027. Despite the omnibus package, the due diligence obligations for German companies are likely to increase as a result.

In particular, the CSDDD expands the catalog of risks that companies must identify. The LkSG currently concerns a limited range of risks, such as child and forced labor, occupational health and safety, unequal treatment, minimum wage, freedom of association, unlawful eviction from land and certain environmental damage and risks. The European Supply Chain Directive adds human rights risks alone, among other things:

  • Torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,
  • Threat to freedom and security, to a person’s privacy,
  • Interference with freedom of thought, conscience and religion and
  • Land eviction.

Explore #more

03.09.2025 | In the media

Guest article in the insurance industry: Embedded Insurance – More than just a new sales channel

The insurance industry is facing a paradigm shift. Traditional sales models are increasingly being supplemented by innovative approaches aimed at facilitating access to insurance policies…

29.08.2025 | In the media

Statement by Ulrich Keunecke on the special infrastructure fund in Politico

KPMG Law financial expert Ulrich Keunecke explains how the infrastructure special fund can be leveraged with capital from private investors. You can find the article…

25.08.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law is advising APELOS on the refinancing and acquisition of a practice group with around 50 practice locations.

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised APELOS Therapie GmbH, a leading therapy practice group in Germany, on the refinancing…

15.08.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in Die-Stiftung.de on the topic of foundation registers – The long road to digital order

The entry into force of the foundation law reform on July 1, 2023 marks a turning point in the German foundation system. The list of…

14.08.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Electromobility in logistics – legal challenges

In order to reduce its CO2 emissions, the logistics industry is increasingly turning to electromobility. This is not only due to ESG regulations such as…

07.08.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

NIS2: How energy suppliers must protect themselves against cyber attacks

In July 2025, the Military Counterintelligence Service reported a significant increase in spying attempts and disruptive measures by the Russian secret service, according to media…

06.08.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Tax havens: When business relationships trigger criminal proceedings

A German tech company had been paying license fees to a contractual partner in Panama for years without ever having any problems. However, few people

06.08.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law, KPMG in Germany and KPMG in Switzerland advised Bureau Veritas on the acquisition of Dornier Hinneburg and its Swiss subsidiary Hinneburg Swiss

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) together with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) and KPMG AG Switzerland advised Bureau Veritas Group (Bureau Veritas) on the acquisition…

05.08.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises Athagoras Holding GmbH on the acquisition of IGES Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to Athagoras Holding GmbH, a platform of the Munich-based PE firm Greenpeak Partners, on the acquisition…

05.08.2025 | In the media

Wirtschaftswoche honors KPMG Law as top law firm in public procurement law

The current ranking of the Handelsblatt Research Institute in cooperation with WirtschaftsWoche has selected the top law firms and top lawyers in the legal fields…

Contact

Dr. Thomas Uhlig

Partner
Head of General Business and Commercial Law

Galeriestraße 2
01067 Dresden

Tel.: +49 351 21294460
tuhlig@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll