
Educational institutions do not currently have to pay social security contributions for teachers, even in the case of bogus self-employment, if both parties originally assumed that the teacher was self-employed and the teacher agreed to this. This transitional rule in Section 127 SGB IV has now been extended until December 31, 2027. The decision takes pressure off the ongoing audit procedures and gives public institutions and private academies, providers of further education measures and other educational institutions more time to reorganize their models for the employment of teachers.
In the long term, however, the employment of honorary staff remains challenging. The Herrenberg ruling sets strict standards and the German Pension Insurance is reviewing the social security status of teachers and lecturers more and more frequently.
Anyone employing freelancers should use the additional time to review contracts and processes and set the course for the time after 2027, especially as Deutsche Rentenversicherung will soon be able to check much larger volumes of data and many more processes with its own AI (“KIRA”).
Honorary staff remain exempt from social security contributions for the time being, despite a different status determination, if
This protective effect was previously valid until the end of 2026, but the latest extension postpones the deadline to December 31, 2027, giving training providers time to review existing structures and develop viable models for the time after that.
The German Pension Insurance generally examines fee-based activities intensively. It is increasingly relying on the ruling of the Federal Social Court of June 28, 2022, which became known as the Herrenberg ruling . In this case, a music teacher worked for a music school on a fee basis. She taught in fixed rooms at set times and was involved in internal processes. The court deemed the activity to be dependent employment despite the fee-based contract.
The ruling clearly shows which factors speak in favor of compulsory social insurance: personal work performance, fixed lesson times, specified rooms, little personal creative power, participation in school events. Those who work in this way are generally not considered self-employed.
This had tangible consequences for training providers: They had to reckon with demands for additional contributions, often in considerable amounts.
Following the ruling, the leading social insurance organizations discussed new standards for status assessment in May 2023. The guidelines were clarified, but uncertainty remained. Many institutions still do not know which criteria prevail in individual cases and how they should structure their models in a legally compliant manner.
The introduction of the transitional regulation on March 1, 2025 was intended to cushion this uncertainty. It gave educational institutions time without the immediate threat of additional demands. The extension that has now been agreed confirms that politicians still see the problem as unresolved.
The extended deadline gives many providers a real advantage:
Providers should use this time. Despite corresponding demands from interest groups, the legislator is making no attempt to create a legal regulation that would allow a clear decision to be made on the existence of self-employment. On the contrary: in discussions with the German Pension Insurance (Deutsche Rentenversicherung), one repeatedly encounters references to the fact that teachers are already subject to compulsory insurance in the statutory pension insurance scheme in accordance with Section 2 No. 1 SGB VI.
The wording of § 127 SGB IV leaves questions unanswered. For example, it remains unclear:
The legal materials provide guidance:
It also remains unclear whether the consent must also cover the actual job description or only the contractual situation. There is no clear legal definition.
The extension of the deadline is an invitation to leave everything as it is. That would be risky. Insurance providers will check carefully after the end of the transition period whether the requirements were met. Above all, however, they will check whether the requirements that will apply to the activities of self-employed teachers from January 1, 2028 have been met. Adapted structures must therefore be implemented and effective by this time.
Recommended now:
The transition rule provides protection, but it is no substitute for a clean structure. The clearer the contractual and deployment models are today, the smoother the transition to the period from 2028 will be.
Associate
Münzgasse 2
04107 Leipzig
Tel.: +49 341 22572 581
fbegemann@kpmg-law.com
Senior Manager
THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main
Tel.: 069 - 951195 185
sulbrich@kpmg-law.com
© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.
KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.