Search
Contact
29.01.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Criminal tax law – Tax evasion: extension of the statute of limitations for prosecution to 15 years

Tax evasion: extension of the statute of limitations for prosecution to 15 years

With the JStG 2020 passed by the Bundestag yesterday, the criminal statute of limitations for particularly serious tax evasion will be increased from 10 years to 15 years.

Background

As was the case with the extension of the statute of limitations for prosecution of particularly serious tax evasion from 5 to 10 years in 2008 in connection with the purchase of data carriers from Liechtenstein, the legislator again decided on a general extension of the statute of limitations on the occasion of the processing of specific cases of tax evasion in connection with Cum-Ex cases. The legislator justifies the extension of the statute of limitations with the difficulties of clarifying highly complex and often international cases of particularly serious evasion. In this respect, the current ten-year statute of limitations already deviates from general criminal law, which would provide for a statute of limitations of 5 years based on the level of punishment for tax evasion.

This is already the second tightening of the criminal statute of limitations this year. In the summer of 2020, the second Corona Tax Assistance Act already extended the absolute statute of limitations – i.e., independent of interruptions – for particularly serious tax evasion.

Which acts are concerned?

The fifteen-year statute of limitations applies to all named cases of particularly serious tax evasion (Section 370 (3) Nos. 1-6 AO). Practically, the most common case is the reduction of taxes “to a large extent”. According to the case law of the Federal Court of Justice, a large scale exists for any tax evasion exceeding EUR 50,000. Especially in the corporate sector, such amounts are quickly reached, e.g. in the case of (conditionally) intentional evasion of income tax, sales tax or wage tax.

The provision shall be applied retroactively to all acts not yet barred by the statute of limitations at the time of its enactment. Following negotiations in the Bundesrat, the law is expected to be promulgated before the end of December.

Impact on law enforcement

The extension of the statute of limitations initially means that cases of particularly serious tax evasion do not become time-barred until 15 years have elapsed since the act was completed. The absolute statute of limitations, i.e. the period when a crime becomes time-barred at the latest, irrespective of any interruptions, e.g. due to investigative measures, is even 37.5 years.

Effects on voluntary disclosure

The new statute of limitations must also be taken into account when dealing with past tax misconduct by means of a self-disclosure that exempts the taxpayer from prosecution. An effective voluntary disclosure requires information on all tax offenses of a tax type that are not subject to the statute of limitations, but at least on all tax offenses of a tax type within the last ten calendar years. This means that cases of particularly serious evasion must be disclosed on the basis of a fifteen-year statute of limitations, instead of the previous ten years. The effectiveness of voluntary disclosures already made is not likely to be affected by the amendment. In this respect, taxpayers may legitimately rely on the fact that legal peace has been established by a voluntary disclosure made in accordance with the law.

Effects on the limitation period for tax assessment

The extension of the statute of limitations for prosecution may also affect the statute of limitations for tax assessment. In the case of tax evasion, the tax assessment period does not expire until the prosecution of the tax offense has become time-barred (so-called suspension of expiration, Section 171 (7) AO). In the case of particularly serious tax evasion, the statute of limitations for tax assessment does not expire until 15 years after the act has been committed.

Explore #more

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

06.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in smartlegalmarket: Trends for legal departments in 2026 & 2027

KPMG Law has been surveying international legal departments on their challenges for more than ten years. The “Right to Progress” report is now regarded as…

06.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Carve-out: The biggest risks and how the legal workstream avoids them

A carve-out does not usually fail due to a lack of ideas. And not due to a lack of buyers. Nor do they usually fail…

04.03.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law expert with statement in dpn magazine on the Location Promotion Act

Shortly after coming into force, the Location Promotion Act is apparently already having a noticeable effect on the investment plans of institutional market participants. In…

25.02.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advised Senstar on the acquisition of Blickfeld

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Senstar group (Senstar) on the acquisition of all shares in Blickfeld GmbH (Blickfeld).…

Contact

Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Partner
Munich Site Manager
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061652
HHoffmann@kpmg-law.com

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

Philipp Schiml

Partner

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

Tel.: +49 211 4155597150
pschiml@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll