Search
Contact
03.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

CO₂ contracts for difference: Participation in the preliminary procedure is a prerequisite for funding

Companies can apply for funding in the preliminary procedure for the climate protection contracts program until 1 December 2025. The funding from the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWE) is aimed at both traditional energy-intensive industries (including chemicals, paper, cement and glass) and small and medium-sized enterprises that want to convert their production processes to be climate-friendly. This is based on the model ofcarbon contracts for difference. Funding is provided for transformation projects that aim to use climate-friendly technologies such as renewable energies, hydrogen or carbon capture and storage (CCU/S).

The funding guideline has been significantly enhanced for the 2026 round and opened up to SMEs in particular. Participation in the preliminary procedure is a mandatory requirement in order to be able to submit a bid in 2026 and thus receive funding. Eligible companies should familiarize themselves with the new regulations at an early stage in order to secure competitive advantages.

What are CO₂ contracts for difference?

CO₂ contracts for difference are state subsidies from the BMWE. The aim is to incentivize energy-intensive companies to switch to climate-friendly technologies, which are currently still associated with high costs.

CO₂ contracts for difference guarantee a fixed CO₂ price over a period of 15 years. The state agrees a base price with the participating companies. If the market price is lower, the state pays the difference; if it is higher, the company is reimbursed. This is intended to create planning security, promote new technologies and strengthen the competitiveness of the industry.

In order to receive such funding, eligible companies must go through three phases: A preparatory procedure, the competitive bidding procedure and, after successful participation in phase 2, the grant relationship begins. Once the funding decision has been approved, the construction and trial operation of the subsidized system can begin. However, the CO₂ contract for difference only begins with the start of the subsequent operational business.

Adjusted funding conditions for 2026

Following the first funding round in 2024, the BMWE has revised and adapted the funding guidelines for 2026. The aim is to make the program more accessible and attractive for SMEs by reducing the minimum annual greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, companies should be able to react more flexibly to unforeseen events and developments, for example by allowing greater deviations from planned emission reductions.

There are several relevant changes with regard to technologies and energy sources: For example, the hurdles for the use of hydrogen have been lowered. In contrast to the first bidding process, technologies for capturing CO₂ for later storage or use (known as carbon capture utilization and storage) are also eligible for funding. Another change is that the production of industrial steam can now be subsidized under certain conditions.

Participation in the preliminary procedure for the 2026 bidding process now possible

Interested companies must participate in the ongoing preliminary procedure by December 1, 2025. To do so, they must submit a complete pre-application by the deadline using the forms provided. December 1, 2025 is a material cut-off date; pre-applications received after this date will no longer be considered. Participation in the preliminary procedure entitles companies to participate in the subsequent bidding procedure. Companies that have already participated in 2024 can take part in the 2026 preliminary procedure by submitting a simple declaration of confirmation.

In the preliminary procedure, companies will also be given the opportunity to ask questions about the bidding process. The bidding process is scheduled to start in mid-2026. It is currently still subject to budgetary approval and requires approval by the EU Commission under state aid law.

Conclusion

Companies should check now whether their transformation projects are eligible for funding, take part in the preliminary procedure and prepare specifically for the 2026 bidding process. Those who understand the funding mechanisms and take a strategic approach can not only secure financial support, but also strengthen their competitive position in the increasingly climate-neutral industrial sector.

 

Explore #more

02.04.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Building Modernization Act (GMG): What is now important for companies

The planned Building Modernization Act (GMG) is set to replace significant parts of the previous Building Energy Act (GEG). Companies in the real estate industry,…

01.04.2026 | In the media

Manager Magazin: KPMG Law in first place for legal advice

Every two years, Manager Magazin, together with the Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Management und Beratung (WGMB), awards Germany’s best auditors with a “Best-in-Class” seal and evaluates

27.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Special Infrastructure Fund and State Aid Law: Orientation for Funding Practice and Planning

The special fund “Infrastructure and Climate Neutrality” (SVIK) also entails considerable responsibility under state aid law for federal states, municipalities and recipients of funds. Anyone

23.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law, KPMG Law AT as well as KPMG in Germany and KPMG in Austria advise GOLDBECK GmbH on the acquisition of 50 percent of the shares in ZAUNERGROUP Holding GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and Buchberger Ettmayer Rechtsanwälte GmbH (KPMG Law AT) as well as KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG in Germany) and KPMG…

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

Contact

Marc Goldberg

Partner

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

Tel.: +49 211 4155597976
marcgoldberg@kpmg-law.de

Sina Glahn

Associate

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530 199 194
sglahn@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll