Search
Contact
Symbolbild zum Batterierecht: Batterien (stehend)
15.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Bundestag adopts new battery law

On September 11, 2025, the German Bundestag passed the Batterierecht-EU-Anpassungsgesetz (Battery Law Adaptation Act) to adapt German battery law to the EU Battery Regulation 2023/1542. Among other things, battery manufacturers and local authorities will have to set up collection systems for all types of batteries in future.

The EU Battery Regulation is a standardized legal framework for the production of batteries and the disposal of waste batteries. The regulation governs, for example, the restriction of hazardous substances, the design and labeling of batteries. It also contains specifications for batteries, due diligence obligations in the supply chain and the collection and treatment of waste batteries.

German battery law now had to be adapted to the requirements of the EU regulation. In particular, the German Battery Act is now to be replaced by a Battery Law Implementation Act (BattDG).

These are the key points of the adjustments:

Manufacturers will have to set up collective collection systems for batteries

In future, battery manufacturers will be obliged to set up collective collection systems for all categories of batteries and to deposit security deposits. Consumers will also be able to return used batteries from e-bikes and e-scooters to municipal collection points. The minimum collection rate of 50% is to remain in place for the time being. In the long term, however, the collection targets will have to be raised and brought into line with the EU Battery Regulation. The collection rate will have to be 63% by the end of 2027 and 73% by the end of 2030.

To enable municipal collection points to equip themselves with special containers for accepting lithium-ion batteries from e-bikes or e-scooters, the take-back obligation for public waste management authorities will not come into force until January 1, 2026.

Local authorities may continue to recycle starter batteries themselves

In future, the public waste management authorities (örE) will also be allowed to market the voluntarily collected waste starter and industrial batteries independently. They should be able to use the disposal proceeds to offset any costs arising from the collection of waste batteries. However, according to the amendment passed by the Bundestag, local authorities will in future have to notify the recycling of starter and industrial batteries in advance and then accept them for a minimum period of two years. Self-recycling is also accompanied by new reporting obligations. For example, detailed data on the number of batteries collected and their recycling routes must be reported annually to the Federal Environment Agency. Another change concerns the inclusion of online platforms in producer responsibility.

Pick-up coordination only as a fall-back option

One concern of battery manufacturers was additional bureaucracy due to official collection coordination by the EAR (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Register) foundation. However, this only comes into play if a collection or take-back point is not affiliated with a producer responsibility organization or a manufacturer, or if the collection is not carried out by the corresponding producer responsibility organization or the manufacturer (substitute solution). In this case, a report must be made to the competent authority, which triggers an official assignment in the first place. An additional inspection obligation has been waived in order to avoid “gold plating” – i.e. excessive implementation of EU requirements.

Federal government to examine the establishment of a deposit system

As part of the legislative process, the Bundestag has also called on the federal government in a resolution to examine the national establishment of a deposit system for batteries containing lithium within one year. Representatives from politics, industry and authorities are to discuss this as part of a round table on “Measures against fire incidents in waste disposal”. By July 31, 2026, the German government is to examine whether battery manufacturers should be more closely involved with the EAR Foundation or via an independent joint body in the future. Such a model could potentially be transferred to other product areas at a later date, which would be subject to extended producer responsibility in the future. In addition, the German government should advocate a Europe-wide regulation for online platforms at EU level as part of the announced Circular Economy Act, which would oblige them to actively participate in complying with the extended producer responsibility requirements.

Conclusion and outlook

In particular, the aim of better separating batteries and recycling them in order to conserve resources and replace finite primary raw materials is a major current and future issue. Companies and local authorities should deal with the changes at an early stage and identify their own need for adaptation.

This is all the more true as the EU Battery Regulation addresses obligations very broadly and, in addition to “producers” of batteries, also covers “economic operators” in general. It should be emphasized that with Section 3 No. 1 BattDG, the legislator has now extended the definition of producer at national level once again, as retailers are now also explicitly considered to be “producers” if they intentionally or negligently provide batteries from producers who are not properly registered. In this respect, the national legislator has opted for “gold plating” and a strict implementation.

In this regard, innovations in other regulations must also be taken into account at an early stage, such as the current implementation process for the Industrial Emissions Directive. With regard to the not new demand for the introduction of a deposit system for batteries containing lithium, it is to be feared that the considerable delay that has now occurred will further exacerbate the unfortunately daily practice of fires and the associated risk of a disposal emergency. A prompt solution would have been particularly important here, an opportunity that has been missed, at least for the time being.

 

Listen to our podcast on the EU Battery Regulation.

 

 

Explore #more

23.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law, KPMG Law AT as well as KPMG in Germany and KPMG in Austria advise GOLDBECK GmbH on the acquisition of 50 percent of the shares in ZAUNERGROUP Holding GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and Buchberger Ettmayer Rechtsanwälte GmbH (KPMG Law AT) as well as KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG in Germany) and KPMG…

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

06.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in smartlegalmarket: Trends for legal departments in 2026 & 2027

KPMG Law has been surveying international legal departments on their challenges for more than ten years. The “Right to Progress” report is now regarded as…

06.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Carve-out: The biggest risks and how the legal workstream avoids them

A carve-out does not usually fail due to a lack of ideas. And not due to a lack of buyers. Nor do they usually fail…

04.03.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law expert with statement in dpn magazine on the Location Promotion Act

Shortly after coming into force, the Location Promotion Act is apparently already having a noticeable effect on the investment plans of institutional market participants. In…

Contact

Dr. Simon Meyer

Partner

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 5997606 5021
simonmeyer@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Sandro Köpper

Associate

Prinzenstr. 23
30159 Hannover

Tel.: +49 511 7635078-153
skoepper@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll