Search
Contact
Symbolbild zu Sozialversicherungspflicht Lehrkräfte: Dozent im Hörsaal
06.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Social insurance obligation for teachers – transitional rule creates clarity

Teachers and lecturers are often hired on a self-employed basis. This practice makes the German pension insurance fund sit up and take notice. It is increasingly checking the social security status of freelancers and demanding payment of social security contributions from the clients, often music and adult education centers. The social courts have repeatedly ruled in their favor.

The practice after the “Herrenberg ruling”

The “Herrenberg ruling” by the Federal Social Court (BSG) on June 28, 2022(B 12 R 3/20 R) set the course in social law case law. A music teacher worked on a fee basis for a music school. She taught in designated rooms and was involved in the organizational processes of the music school. The BSG considered the activity to be a dependent employment relationship despite the contractual agreement of self-employment. In the opinion of the BSG, the essential characteristics of an employment relationship subject to social insurance contributions were: the obligation to personally perform work, fixed lesson times and rooms, the lack of entrepreneurial options and the obligation to participate in school events.

For companies in the education sector, this ruling has so far resulted in one thing in particular: teachers are generally already considered to be employees subject to social security contributions and not self-employed if they are integrated into the work organization and follow the instructions of the company. This means that companies have to pay social security contributions for their freelance staff, which can mean a considerable financial burden for them.

In response to the “Herrenberg ruling”, the leading social insurance organizations discussed the assessment of teachers and lecturers under insurance law on 4 May 2023 and defined more precise assessment standards. However, the legal uncertainty remained. Since then, providers of educational institutions have had to continue to expect additional claims from social insurance providers due to bogus self-employment; a not inconsiderable financial risk.

Transitional arrangement at the “last minute”

A transitional regulation for teaching activities in Section 127 SGB IV, which was passed as part of one of the last legislative amendments by the last Bundestag and has been in force since March 1, 2025, should now provide legal clarity – at least for the time being.

The main content of this transitional provision is as follows: Even if the status is determined differently by an insurance provider, there is no obligation to pay insurance and contributions until December 31, 2026, provided that the parties to the contract

  1. have unanimously assumed self-employment and
  2. the person carrying out the teaching activity agrees to this.

The parties therefore have until the end of 2026 to convert the employment relationship. Even if no status determination decision has yet been issued, the parties are protected until the deadline.

Educational institutions get time for adjustments

The transitional regulation in Section 127 SGB IV is to be welcomed, as schools now have planning security until December 31, 2026 and are protected from claims for back payments by social insurance institutions. The legislator’s aim was to give educational institutions and teachers sufficient time to make the necessary adjustments to their organizational and business models so that teaching activities can continue to be carried out both in dependent employment and on a self-employed basis even under the changed framework conditions.

The transitional regulation still needs to be interpreted

As concise as the provisions of Section 127 SGB IV are, they are still open to interpretation. For example, it is not clear from the wording to whom the teacher must declare their consent. According to the legislative materials, the addressee of the declaration is either the insurance provider (if a status determination procedure has been carried out) or the educational institution (if no status determination procedure has been carried out). It is also unclear what the object of the consent must be – the conformity of the contractual situation and the actual contractual relationship or the waiver of the social insurance obligation. The legislator fails to provide a clear definition at this point.

Educational institutions should review the requirements of Section 127 SGB IV

Educational institutions and schools are therefore strongly advised to use the transition period to review existing contractual relationships and to ensure that they are legally compliant for the period from January 1, 2027. In particular, they should also check the requirements of Section 127 SGB IV. They should be sure that the work is teaching and that the teacher has agreed that no social security contributions will be paid. The insurance providers are likely to pay particular attention to checking these cases. It is therefore advisable to document the fee-based teacher’s consent in writing in order to provide evidence. At the same time, they should examine the individual circumstances of the specific case and keep an eye on the case law on status assessment, as clarifications from the legislator or case law can be expected. This is particularly important because the coalition parties have also committed themselves in the current coalition agreement to addressing the status assessment procedure in the new legislative period and making it faster, more legally secure and more transparent, for example by introducing a fictitious approval.

 

Explore #more

27.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Cell Phone Inspections at US Border and Beyond: What to Expect

Key facts: U.S. immigration officials monitor public social media data and travelers should be prepared to share details about their personal social media accounts. All…

23.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Travel and Assignment in the USA: What you need to know about US immigration

The recent changes in US immigration rules are causing uncertainty worldwide. In particular, since the new US government took office, processes regarding entry into the…

14.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

BGH on customer installations: Decision orders application in line with the directive

In a ruling dated May 13, 2025, the BGH classified the supply infrastructure in the specific case of a residential complex in Zwickau as a…

13.05.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law expert in Spiegel article on energy policy

Dirk-Henning Meier, Senior Manager in the energy law department at KPMG Law, is quoted in a recent article on energy policy in Der Spiegel.…

13.05.2025 | Career, In the media

azur Karriere Magazin – All AI or what?

Artificial intelligence has long since arrived in law firms and legal departments. But dealing with it is a skill that needs to be learned. Many…

13.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Initial experience with the Single-Use Plastics Fund Act: what manufacturers should bear in mind

Beverage cups, foil and plastic cigarette filters litter streets, parks and sidewalks. The cleaning costs are borne by the local authorities. The Disposable Plastics Fund…

07.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Termination of fixed-term rental agreements in the case of pre-leasing

In the case of a pre-leasing, the tenancy only begins at a later date, usually the handover date. In such cases, the contracting parties usually…

06.05.2025 | In the media

Wirtschaftswoche honors KPMG Law

KPMG Law was named “TOP Law Firm 2025” in the field of M&A by WirtschaftsWoche. Ian Maywald, Partner at KPMG Law in Munich, was…

02.05.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in FINANCE Magazine: How CFOs can save up to 80 percent in the legal department

The cost pressure in companies is increasing – also in legal departments. Two strategies have now become established to save 50 to 80 percent of…

30.04.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law study in the Neue Kämmerer: How does the special fund get into the municipalities?

A special fund of 500 billion euros is to finance investments in infrastructure over the next twelve years. Of this, 100 billion euros are earmarked…

Contact

Friederike Begemann

Associate

Münzgasse 2
04107 Leipzig

Tel.: +49 341 22572 581
fbegemann@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Sebastian Ulbrich, LL.M.

Senior Manager

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: 069 - 951195 185
sulbrich@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll