Search
Contact
Symbolbild zu Grundsteuer als Betriebskosten: Mietshäuser
07.01.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Property tax as operating costs: Three current questions and answers

As part of the operating and ancillary costs, the property tax levied on a rented residential or commercial property can regularly be passed on to tenants. The property tax reform came into force on January 1, 2025. Property tax will now be determined on the basis of the new statutory rules and new municipal assessment rates. Tenants are likely to take a very close look at the first property tax assessments issued under the new rules when they receive their utility bills for the 2025 calendar year. Landlords therefore already have a number of questions that should not be postponed. We would like to comment below on the most important property tax issues for commercial property management: How exactly do landlords themselves have to check the property tax assessments they receive before they charge the tax on, and what happens if a tenant finds errors in the tax assessment?

 

Does a landlord have to check the property tax assessment notice before allocating the property tax as operating costs?

Yes, every landlord who passes on the property tax has a secondary contractual obligation towards his tenants under the rental agreement to check the tax bases of a property tax assessment and its accuracy. As a manifestation of the principle of economic efficiency, every landlord may only pass on to the tenant those costs that are justified on conscientious consideration of all circumstances and in the ordinary course of business and which he would also be prepared to bear himself if he were to use the property himself. The landlord must therefore not only check the tax assessment, but also notify the tax office of any changes in the property portfolio if they are relevant to the tax bases, such as a change in the use of the property. This alone presents property owners with major challenges. The obligation to check already relates to the property tax assessment notice, which property owners in Germany have generally already received. This is because, according to the Federal Fiscal Court, the property tax assessment notice acts as a basic assessment notice for the property tax assessment notice, which in turn is a basic assessment notice for the property tax assessment notice. If the property tax assessment notice is final, taxpayers can no longer take action against the assessment of the property tax value. Landlords therefore have to deal with the property tax for their properties several times: with regard to the correct property tax value, the correct tax assessment figure and finally the correct multiplication with the new assessment rate applicable in the municipality for property tax assessment.

 

What must a landlord do if his or her tenant discovers an error in the property tax assessment notice and complains about the utility bill?

If it turns out that the property tax assessment is incorrect and the tax stated in the utility bill is too high, tenants of residential or commercial premises are entitled to a new bill. However, residential tenants can only claim a correction to the statement within the time limit set out in Section 556 (3) sentence 5 BGB, i.e. by the end of the twelfth month after receipt of the statement at the latest. Tenants of commercial premises often agree a similar exclusion period for claims. Otherwise, the statutory limitation period of three years applies in accordance with Section 195 BGB. The tenant may also be entitled to claim damages from the landlord for unnecessary costs in the event of incorrect re-invoicing.

 

Until when can a landlord correct an incorrect statement of operating or ancillary costs if he himself subsequently discovers errors in a property tax assessment?

In the case of residential leases, landlords must submit the statement of operating costs to their tenants by the end of the twelfth month after the end of the billing period at the latest. Changes to the statement can generally no longer be asserted after the deadline, unless the landlord is not responsible for the late assertion. This would be the case, for example, if the property tax assessment notice is not issued in good time before the deadline expires or has to be adjusted again if it was initially incorrect. If, on the other hand, the landlord has submitted the property tax return too late or checked the property tax assessment notice too late, he can generally no longer make additional claims against the tenants after the twelve-month period has expired. It is therefore recommended that residential landlords check property tax assessments very soon after receipt. Landlords of commercial properties should also do this, even if the twelve-month period only applies directly to them if agreed in the tenancy agreement. In any case, it is advisable for landlords to make it clear in the tenancy agreement that they may assert additional claims if they receive notices after the deadline through no fault of their own. The property tax assessment notice and the tax bases, the property tax value, the property tax rate and the assessment rate should also be checked very thoroughly; a quick plausibility check is not sufficient. The tenant regularly has twelve months to check the notification sent with the utility bill in detail. Subsequent corrections and reimbursement payments are annoying for any landlord. Authors:
KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft: Jürgen Lindauer
KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH: Dr. Rainer Algermissen, Human Aghel

 

 

Explore #more

24.03.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Product piracy in online retail: these are the latest tricks

Product piracy is also flourishing with the growth in online trade. A major problem for brand owners, but also a challenge for online marketplaces and…

24.03.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises Munich Airport on the sale of aerogate München Gesellschaft für Luftverkehrsabfertigungen mbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to Flughafen München GmbH (FMG) on the sale of its subsidiary aerogate München Gesellschaft für Luftverkehrsabfertigungen…

21.03.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

20.03.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AI Act: This applies to AI in universities and research

Artificial intelligence (AI) offers numerous opportunities for research, teaching and administration, but also raises complex legal issues. The European Union’s AI Regulation(AI Act)…

19.03.2025 | In the media

BUJ/KPMG Law Summit Transformation

The Bundesverband der Unternehmensjuristinnen und Unternehmensjuristen e.V. (BUJ) and KPMG Law cordially invite you to the BUJ Summit Transformation on May 28, 2025 in Frankfurt…

18.03.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the German transport magazine DVZ: Planning at a crawl; DIHK sees great potential for faster traffic route construction

The Chamber of Commerce in Arnsberg regularly awards prizes to the worst state roads in the Hellweg-Sauerland region of Westphalia. A funny idea, if it…

13.03.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

ECJ tightens antitrust liability for information exchange

The ECJ (C-298/22) has recently set strict standards for the permissible exchange of information between companies. As a result, companies are now even more faced…

11.03.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview with HAUFE: LkSG after the elections – everything new?

Many companies have made considerable efforts to implement the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act. The political discussion about its abolition is now causing uncertainty. KPMG…

07.03.2025 | In the media

Guest article in unternehmensjurist: Implementing the requirements of the BFSG correctly

The Barrier-Free Accessibility Reinforcement Act requires companies to offer certain products and services without barriers. The obligations vary depending on the role in business transactions.…

05.03.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in TextilWirtschaft: What the changes from Brussels mean for the fashion industry

It’s now official: the EU Commission will massively simplify the planned sustainability reporting. The Supply Chain Law Initiative examines the announced changes to the CSDDD…

Contact

Dr. Rainer Algermissen

Partner
Head of Construction and Real Estate Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 3609945331
ralgermissen@kpmg-law.com

Human Aghel

Senior Manager

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 3609945451
haghel@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll