Search
Contact
11.03.2020 | KPMG Law Insights

Foreign trade law & export control – Observe AWV reporting obligation – Minimize fine risks and optimize costs with effective & efficient reporting processes

AWV reporting obligation – Minimize fine risks and optimize costs with effective & efficient reporting processes

As an accounting or treasury manager in companies with international business relationships, you are probably familiar with the notice on account statements regarding compliance with reporting requirements under foreign trade law. From our experts, you will learn what risks you should consider, where sources of error lie, and what opportunities exist to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of reporting processes.

The obligation to submit foreign trade reports is based on the provisions of Sections 63 et seq. of the Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance (AWV). Accordingly, payment reports, stock reports and asset reports must be submitted to the Deutsche Bundesbank for the purpose of drawing up the balance of payments for the Federal Republic of Germany. Compliance with the reporting requirements is regularly audited by the Deutsche Bundesbank and by the customs authorities, irrespective of the industry. Incorrect, incomplete or late declarations constitute violations of the AWV and can be punished as administrative offenses by the customs authorities responsible for them. In accordance with the provisions on fines under § 19 para. 6 AWG, fines of up to EUR 30,000 per reporting violation are possible. In addition, company owners and executives may be sued for damages pursuant to Sec. § Section 130 OWiG (in conjunction with Section 9 OWiG) fines can be imposed for breaches of supervisory duties. It is also possible to sanction the companies concerned themselves by imposing association fines (Section 30 OWiG).

Based on our experience, we can divide the most common sources of errors into the following categories:

  • Ignorance and lack of clarity regarding the applicable regulations: The regulations of the AWV reporting system, which are substantiated and supplemented by numerous fact sheets and the “Explanatory Notes on the List of Services for the Balance of Payments” of the Deutsche Bundesbank, are extensive and complex. Since the audited companies are often unaware of the relevant regulations, it is not uncommon for audits to reveal numerous violations of reporting requirements. Due to the failure to deal with the regulatory provisions and the lack of employee training, there is often a lack of the know-how required to submit correct, complete and timely reports.
  • No clearly defined responsibilities: Due to a lack of guidelines, there is a lack of clarity regarding the reporting sheets to be completed and the departments and persons responsible for them. This often leads to the fact that reportable facts are not processed correctly and reports are not submitted at all, are submitted incorrectly or are submitted twice.
  • Process Weaknesses: In our experience, meeting regulatory requirements against the backdrop of the large number of reportable transactions with different reporting characteristics is one of the biggest challenges in the area of foreign trade reporting. Efficiency and cost pressures, a steadily increasing volume of documents and, last but not least, the short reporting deadlines mean that manual activities for preparing the reports must be reduced to a minimum. Often the potential of process automation is not recognized. Examples include the lack of use of system functionalities and a high level of manual effort in terms of recognizing the reporting obligation, deriving the reporting characteristics, and processing and aggregating data. Inefficiencies and potential errors are the result.
  • IT error sources: Increasing automation of reporting processes is always accompanied by additional, system-related risks that need to be monitored. Faulty or suboptimal system settings lead to the recording of reporting-relevant data being forgotten or the entry not being possible in the first place. Low data availability and reliability then leads to increased downstream compilation and control efforts. High data availability, on the other hand, which is essential for the automated derivation of reporting characteristics, entails the risk of incorrect interpretation of individual fields and field values. Likewise, sources of error lie in system reports and tools such as e.g. SQL routines used to identify reportable transactions and derive reporting characteristics.

KPMG creates transparency and thereby reduces risks and costs – with an individual approach aligned to your needs and the maturity of your reporting processes. We advise on regulatory requirements and identify your reportable issues, applicable reporting sheets, and existing reporting gaps. On the basis of the established facts, we support you in the preparation of subsequent notifications and, if necessary, examine the possibility of a voluntary self-disclosure in accordance with § 22 para. 4 AWG. When fine proceedings are initiated, we develop the necessary defense strategy and coordinate the proceedings and communication with the investigating authorities.

We also evaluate your data basis and availability as well as the technical maturity level and determine possible automation potentials. Based on this, we support you in defining, implementing and optimizing the reporting processes up to fully automated creation. To sustainably ensure the effectiveness of your reporting processes, we provide comprehensive training materials tailored to the target group, define guidelines and manuals, and advise you on possible quality assurance measures or a possible centralization of the reporting process organization.

Our range of services in the field of foreign trade reporting is wide – feel free to contact us with your individual questions!

Explore #more

25.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement: The plans for supply chain law, EUDR and GTC law

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD agreed: “We will also abolish the National Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG).” At first glance,…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the coalition agreement means for the financial sector

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD also has an impact on the financial sector. Here is an overview. Increasing the energy supply The…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AWG amendment provides for tougher penalties for sanction violations

Due to the ongoing Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, the EU wants to make it easier to prosecute violations of EU sanctions. The corresponding…

16.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the new digitization plans in the coalition agreement mean

The coalition agreement shows how the future government wants to shape Germany’s digital future. What do the plans mean for companies in concrete terms? Here…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new coalition wants to accelerate investment in infrastructure

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD marks a fundamental new beginning in German infrastructure policy. In view of a considerable investment backlog, the…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025 and NKWS: Booster for environmental and planning law?

In the current coalition agreement, environmental and planning law is mentioned at various points throughout the coalition agreement, highlighting its great importance. However, the…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What’s next for foreign trade? The plans in the 2025 coalition agreement

Foreign trade and foreign trade have become particularly explosive in view of the new US tariffs. The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on the following…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: What the plans mean for the economy

The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on a coalition agreement. The central theme is the renewal of the promise of the social market economy. The…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: Housing construction on the move

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed comprehensive reform plans in the area of housing construction. The aim is to speed…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Energy in the 2025 coalition agreement: what the future government is planning

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD commit to the German and European climate targets and Germany’s climate neutrality by 2045. To this…

Contact

Anne-Kathrin Gillig

Partner
Frankfurt am Main Site Manager
Head of Compliance and Business Criminal Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195013
agillig@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll