Search
Contact
06.07.2017 | KPMG Law Insights

Duty to provide information on readiness for arbitration

Duty to provide information on readiness for arbitration

Since February 1, 2017, §§ 36, 37 of the Act on Alternative Dispute Resolution in Consumer Matters (VSBG) have imposed an information obligation on entrepreneurs regarding their own willingness to arbitrate. This information obligation applies in particular to housing companies, real estate agencies and construction companies.

The Alternative Dispute Resolution Act (VSBG) already came into force on April 1, 2016. However, it is only since February 1, 2017 that Sections 36, 37 VSBG apply, which regulate the information obligations of an entrepreneur regarding his willingness to arbitrate in the event of a dispute.

The VSBG serves to implement Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the alternative settlement of consumer disputes. While the Directive only refers to sales and service contracts, the CDBG goes beyond this and is not limited to the types of contracts mentioned.

Obligation to indicate readiness for arbitration

The introduction of a duty to provide information is intended to enable any disputes between a trader and a consumer to be settled quickly out of court. However, the duty to inform also applies if the entrepreneur is not willing to participate in dispute resolution. Transparency is to be created as to which entrepreneurs generally refuse to engage in consumer arbitration. In order to avoid damage to their reputation, many companies will certainly opt for the option of out-of-court dispute resolution and publicize this as such. In addition, the aim is to save consumers the effort and expense that could result from unsuccessfully appealing to a conciliation body.

Various information requirements

A distinction must first be made between general information obligations pursuant to Section 36 para. 1 No. 1 VSBG and obligations to provide information after a dispute has arisen pursuant to § 37 VSBG. Both information obligations exist side by side and only apply if an entrepreneur concludes or has concluded a contract with a consumer. Entrepreneurs in the sense of § 14 BGB (German Civil Code) are obliged to provide information.

According to § 36 para. 1 No. 1 VSBG, an entrepreneur who maintains a website or uses general terms and conditions must inform the consumer in an easily accessible, clear and understandable manner whether he is willing or obliged to participate in dispute resolution proceedings. Housing companies in particular will use general terms and conditions vis-à-vis consumers in the form of standardized rental agreements. However, construction companies and brokers who conclude contracts with consumers are also affected by the obligation to provide information that has come into force. However, companies that employed only ten or fewer persons as of December 31 of the respective previous year are not subject to the general duty to provide information under Section 36 VSBG.

According to § 37 VSBG, the entrepreneur must inform the consumer of a consumer arbitration board that is competent for him, stating its address and website, if the dispute concerning a consumer contract could not be settled by the entrepreneur and the consumer. At the same time, the entrepreneur must indicate whether he is willing or obliged to participate in a dispute resolution procedure at this consumer arbitration board. In contrast to the duty to provide information under Section 36 VSBG, this duty applies to all companies that conclude contracts with consumers, even if their number of employees is small.

Form of information

An entrepreneur who is subject to the general duty to provide information pursuant to Section 36 VSBG must inform the consumer in an easily accessible, clear and comprehensible manner about the extent to which he is willing or obliged to participate in a dispute resolution procedure. If the Contractor has declared its willingness to do so or if it is legally obliged to do so, the Contractor shall also refer to the relevant competent body. This information must be provided in accordance with § 36 para. 2 VSBG shall be made available on the website of the entrepreneur, provided that the entrepreneur maintains such a website. If the entrepreneur uses general terms and conditions, the information must be handed over together with the general terms and conditions.

The information according to § 37 VSBG must be provided to the consumer in text form.

Violation of the duty to inform

In the event of a breach by a trader of its duty to provide information, the consumer has the option of asserting claims against the trader for breach of pre-contractual or contractual obligations. In addition, consumer protection associations can enforce compliance with the information requirements via the Injunctions Act (Unterlassungsklagengesetz – UKlaG), which primarily involves costs for the entrepreneur.

Practice Notes

Insofar as an entrepreneur should be subject to general information obligations pursuant to Section 36 VSBG on the basis of the conditions described above, entrepreneurs should indicate in their general terms and conditions, in particular also in residential leases, as well as on their websites whether they are obligated or otherwise willing to settle disputes before a consumer arbitration board. If any of the above conditions are met, the website and address of the competent body must also be provided. These additions should be addressed in the near term if not already done. So far, many clauses and websites do not yet take the new legal situation into account.

Explore #more

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

07.11.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group. KPMG Law provided legal…

07.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Changes to the H-1B visa and their consequences for US hiring and secondment practices

President Trump’s administration has introduced two significant changes to the highly popular H-1B visa program for skilled workers: The previous random lottery will be replaced…

07.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement on HAUFE: Confusion surrounding the EU Deforestation Regulation – and what companies should do now

Possibly, perhaps, under certain circumstances, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) will not be binding for large and medium-sized enterprises on December 30, 2025 and for…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

External personnel: authorities tighten checks with AI support

AI is a blessing for many companies, but it can also quickly become a curse, especially when authorities use the technology to uncover legal violations…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Deforestation regulation – simplification instead of postponement?

In September, the EU Commission wanted to postpone the EUDR deforestation regulation. On October 21, 2025, it published a comprehensive proposal to simplify the EUDR

05.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Employer of Record now not subject to authorization after all – change of heart at BA

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Employment Agency (BA) updated its technical directives and made a U-turn with regard to the so-called employer-of-record model: In…

Contact

Dr. Rainer Algermissen

Partner
Head of Construction and Real Estate Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 3609945331
ralgermissen@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll