Search
Contact
07.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Changes to the H-1B visa and their consequences for US hiring and secondment practices

President Trump’s administration has introduced two significant changes to the highly popular H-1B visa program for skilled workers: The previous random lottery will be replaced by a salary-based selection process. And: The US will impose an additional one-time fee of $100,000 for certain H-1B applications. The changes will have a significant impact on employers who want to hire and second their non-US skilled workers in the US. Employers should review their US hiring and secondment practices if necessary and consider alternatives to the H-1B visa.

What is the H-1B visa for skilled workers?

Introduced in 1990, the H-1B visa program for skilled workers is a US non-immigrant visa category that allows US companies to employ highly qualified foreign workers for up to six years in specialty occupations in the US. Under certain circumstances, additional extensions are possible. A specialty occupation is one that typically requires at least a bachelor’s degree or equivalent professional experience in the relevant field. Common specialty occupations include engineers, nurses, accountants, university professors, etc.

Since the visa is flexible in terms of the types of professions eligible and is suitable for longer-term assignments, it is very popular with US employers to leverage when there are no qualified candidates available domestically. However, only 85,000 new H-1B visas are issued each year, of which 20,000 are reserved for candidates with at least a master’s degree from a US university. Demand for new H-1B visas greatly exceeds supply, which results in an annual lottery that determines which employers can proceed in filing new H-1B petitions for which candidates.

Per the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, in 2025, 343.981 candidates were registered by US employers in the H-1B lottery.

First change: H-1B lottery reform

Historically, the lottery was based on a random selection process to give all registered candidates equal opportunity of selection, regardless of their position, salary, or experience. Now, candidates with higher salaries are to be given priority.

The proposed rule that would facilitate this change was published in the U.S. Federal Register on September 24, 2025, subject to notice and comment from the public until November 24, 2025. The rule is expected to become final / law after November 24, 2025.

The idea is that those that employers wish to hire into higher paying roles are more skilled than those in lower paying roles.

In general, the US government groups similar positions into broad occupational categories and divides them into four “wage levels.” Entry-level positions typically fall under wage levels 1 and 2, while positions that require more experience are usually assigned to wage levels 3 and 4. Wage levels are adjusted annually and vary depending on the position and geographic location. Under the new rules, applicants entered into the lottery for a wage level 4 position will be entered into the lottery 4 times, applicants for level 3 positions, 3 times, and so on. This change not only affects the selection probability of registered candidates but also requires employers to determine the occupational classification and wage level of the position in question before registering their candidate into the lottery.

The US government believes that this change will help fill important positions in industries such as technology and healthcare with the most qualified candidates. However, it will likely disadvantage recent graduates and those just starting their careers.

Second change: H-1B fee of $100,000

On September 19, 2025, President Trump announced a new additional fee of $100,000 for H-1B applications, which will be added to the existing H-1B application fees. After considerable uncertainty among employers and their H-1B employees about exactly which H-1B applications would be subject to this new additional fee, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) issued guidance on October 20, 2025. According to this guidance, the fee applies only to H-1B applications filed on or after September 21, 2025, and are approved as consular notifications. This means that the fee does not apply to H-1B applications filed on or after September 21 and approved as changes or extensions of status within the United States. H-1B applications for which employers request a change or extension within the United States but are approved by USCIS as consular notifications will be subject to the $100,000 fee.

Cases subject to the $100,000 fee:

  • H-1B petitions that request consular notification because the prospective employee is outside the United States
  • H-1B applications that request consular notification because the employee is not eligible for a change of status or extension within the United States

Cases not subject to the $100,000 fee:

  • H-1B applications to extend an employee’s existing H-1B status within the United States
  • H-1B applications for simultaneous extension and amendment of status
  • H-1B applications involving a change of status within the United States from another non-immigrant category to H-1B

The Trump administration justifies the fee by citing the high number of H-1B applicants and approvals, claiming it contributes to unemployment among American citizens, especially young college graduates aged 22 to 27. By imposing higher costs on companies that employ non-US workers, the administration hopes to encourage companies to hire local US workers and only recruit highly skilled foreign professionals.

At the time of publication, two lawsuits challenging the legality of the $100,000 fee are pending in US courts. However, the lawsuits do not have a suspensive effect. This means that the US can continue to impose the fee, at least until a court decision ordering otherwise has been issued.

Alternatives to the H-1B visa

For many employers, paying the $100,000 fee is not affordable, even for their most qualified employees and applicants. Therefore, US employers of non-US workers should consider which employees they would like to hire on an H-1B visa or whether alternative forms of work authorization in the US are an option, such as E-1/2, L-1, or O-1.

Explore #more

07.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement on HAUFE: Confusion surrounding the EU Deforestation Regulation – and what companies should do now

Possibly, perhaps, under certain circumstances, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) will not be binding for large and medium-sized enterprises on December 30, 2025 and for…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

External personnel: authorities tighten checks with AI support

AI is a blessing for many companies, but it can also quickly become a curse, especially when authorities use the technology to uncover legal violations…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Deforestation regulation – simplification instead of postponement?

In September, the EU Commission wanted to postpone the EUDR deforestation regulation. On October 21, 2025, it published a comprehensive proposal to simplify the EUDR

05.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Employer of Record now not subject to authorization after all – change of heart at BA

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Employment Agency (BA) updated its technical directives and made a U-turn with regard to the so-called employer-of-record model: In…

03.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

CO₂ contracts for difference: Participation in the preliminary procedure is a prerequisite for funding

Companies can apply for funding in the preliminary procedure for the climate protection contracts program until 1 December 2025. The funding from the Federal Ministry…

29.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Fund Risk Limitation Act and Location Promotion Act create new scope for infrastructure funds

As the federal government’s special infrastructure fund of 500 billion euros will probably not be enough to finance Germany’s roads, networks and the energy transition,…

29.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises management board of Nürnberger Beteiligungs-AG on sale to Vienna Insurance Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the Management Board of Nürnberger Beteiligungs-AG throughout the entire public takeover process by Vienna Insurance Group…

29.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

BAG on pair comparison: How employers should deal with salary differences

The Federal Labor Court (BAG) has issued another landmark decision on equal pay. In its ruling of October 23, 2025 (Ref. 8 AZR 300/24),…

23.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the Federal Network Agency’s FAQs mean for storage system operators

On October 17, 2025, the Federal Network Agency published FAQs on the regulatory treatment of stationary battery storage systems (“BESS”). The FAQs are a guide…

23.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the “construction turbo” means for municipalities and building supervisory authorities

The Bundestag has passed the “construction turbo” and local authorities can now significantly accelerate certain construction projects. According to the law passed on October 9,…

Contact

Sabine Paul, LL.M. (University of Stellenbosch)

Partner

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530199196
sabinepaul@kpmg-law.com

Sarah O’Neill

Manager

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.:
sarahoneill2@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll