Search
Contact
Symbolbild für H-1B-Visum: Wolkenkratzer in den Wolken
07.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Changes to the H-1B visa and their consequences for US hiring and secondment practices

President Trump’s administration has introduced two significant changes to the highly popular H-1B visa program for skilled workers: The previous random lottery will be replaced by a salary-based selection process. And: The US will impose an additional one-time fee of $100,000 for certain H-1B applications. The changes will have a significant impact on employers who want to hire and second their non-US skilled workers in the US. Employers should review their US hiring and secondment practices if necessary and consider alternatives to the H-1B visa.

What is the H-1B visa for skilled workers?

Introduced in 1990, the H-1B visa program for skilled workers is a US non-immigrant visa category that allows US companies to employ highly qualified foreign workers for up to six years in specialty occupations in the US. Under certain circumstances, additional extensions are possible. A specialty occupation is one that typically requires at least a bachelor’s degree or equivalent professional experience in the relevant field. Common specialty occupations include engineers, nurses, accountants, university professors, etc.

Since the visa is flexible in terms of the types of professions eligible and is suitable for longer-term assignments, it is very popular with US employers to leverage when there are no qualified candidates available domestically. However, only 85,000 new H-1B visas are issued each year, of which 20,000 are reserved for candidates with at least a master’s degree from a US university. Demand for new H-1B visas greatly exceeds supply, which results in an annual lottery that determines which employers can proceed in filing new H-1B petitions for which candidates.

Per the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, in 2025, 343.981 candidates were registered by US employers in the H-1B lottery.

First change: H-1B lottery reform

Historically, the lottery was based on a random selection process to give all registered candidates equal opportunity of selection, regardless of their position, salary, or experience. Now, candidates with higher salaries are to be given priority.

The proposed rule that would facilitate this change was published in the U.S. Federal Register on September 24, 2025, subject to notice and comment from the public until November 24, 2025. The rule is expected to become final / law after November 24, 2025.

The idea is that those that employers wish to hire into higher paying roles are more skilled than those in lower paying roles.

In general, the US government groups similar positions into broad occupational categories and divides them into four “wage levels.” Entry-level positions typically fall under wage levels 1 and 2, while positions that require more experience are usually assigned to wage levels 3 and 4. Wage levels are adjusted annually and vary depending on the position and geographic location. Under the new rules, applicants entered into the lottery for a wage level 4 position will be entered into the lottery 4 times, applicants for level 3 positions, 3 times, and so on. This change not only affects the selection probability of registered candidates but also requires employers to determine the occupational classification and wage level of the position in question before registering their candidate into the lottery.

The US government believes that this change will help fill important positions in industries such as technology and healthcare with the most qualified candidates. However, it will likely disadvantage recent graduates and those just starting their careers.

Second change: H-1B fee of $100,000

On September 19, 2025, President Trump announced a new additional fee of $100,000 for H-1B applications, which will be added to the existing H-1B application fees. After considerable uncertainty among employers and their H-1B employees about exactly which H-1B applications would be subject to this new additional fee, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) issued guidance on October 20, 2025. According to this guidance, the fee applies only to H-1B applications filed on or after September 21, 2025, and are approved as consular notifications. This means that the fee does not apply to H-1B applications filed on or after September 21 and approved as changes or extensions of status within the United States. H-1B applications for which employers request a change or extension within the United States but are approved by USCIS as consular notifications will be subject to the $100,000 fee.

Cases subject to the $100,000 fee:

  • H-1B petitions that request consular notification because the prospective employee is outside the United States
  • H-1B applications that request consular notification because the employee is not eligible for a change of status or extension within the United States

Cases not subject to the $100,000 fee:

  • H-1B applications to extend an employee’s existing H-1B status within the United States
  • H-1B applications for simultaneous extension and amendment of status
  • H-1B applications involving a change of status within the United States from another non-immigrant category to H-1B

The Trump administration justifies the fee by citing the high number of H-1B applicants and approvals, claiming it contributes to unemployment among American citizens, especially young college graduates aged 22 to 27. By imposing higher costs on companies that employ non-US workers, the administration hopes to encourage companies to hire local US workers and only recruit highly skilled foreign professionals.

At the time of publication, two lawsuits challenging the legality of the $100,000 fee are pending in US courts. However, the lawsuits do not have a suspensive effect. This means that the US can continue to impose the fee, at least until a court decision ordering otherwise has been issued.

Alternatives to the H-1B visa

For many employers, paying the $100,000 fee is not affordable, even for their most qualified employees and applicants. Therefore, US employers of non-US workers should consider which employees they would like to hire on an H-1B visa or whether alternative forms of work authorization in the US are an option, such as E-1/2, L-1, or O-1.

Explore #more

02.04.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Building Modernization Act (GMG): What is now important for companies

The planned Building Modernization Act (GMG) is set to replace significant parts of the previous Building Energy Act (GEG). Companies in the real estate industry,…

01.04.2026 | In the media

Manager Magazin: KPMG Law in first place for legal advice

Every two years, Manager Magazin, together with the Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Management und Beratung (WGMB), awards Germany’s best auditors with a “Best-in-Class” seal and evaluates

27.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Special Infrastructure Fund and State Aid Law: Orientation for Funding Practice and Planning

The special fund “Infrastructure and Climate Neutrality” (SVIK) also entails considerable responsibility under state aid law for federal states, municipalities and recipients of funds. Anyone

23.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law, KPMG Law AT as well as KPMG in Germany and KPMG in Austria advise GOLDBECK GmbH on the acquisition of 50 percent of the shares in ZAUNERGROUP Holding GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and Buchberger Ettmayer Rechtsanwälte GmbH (KPMG Law AT) as well as KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG in Germany) and KPMG…

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

Contact

Sabine Paul, LL.M. (University of Stellenbosch)

Partner

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530199196
sabinepaul@kpmg-law.com

Sarah O’Neill

Manager

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.:
sarahoneill2@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll