Search
Contact
04.07.2017 | KPMG Law Insights

Breathing a sigh of relief for non-profit daycare associations: legal and registration capability exists

Breathing a sigh of relief for non-profit daycare associations: legal and registration capability exists

In its decision of May 16, 2017, Case No.: II ZB 7/16, the Federal Supreme Court overturned the “Kita case law” practiced by the Kammergericht since 2011. This was expected by very few people.

“Kita Jurisprudence” of the Superior Court of Justice
In recent years, the Kammergericht (KG) has repeatedly ruled that non-profit associations that operate day care centers for children are not eligible for registration and thus do not have legal capacity. For the KG, the associations are mainly aimed at economic business operations due to the operation of the daycare centers and are therefore not to be classified as non-material associations within the meaning of Section 21 of the German Civil Code (BGB). This case law has been welcomed in the literature and is considered to be consistent and in line with the protection of creditors.

Decision of the BGH of May 16, 2017
Now, in the case of a Berlin association that operates nine daycare centers, each with 16 to 32 children, the BGH has overturned the ordered deletion of the association from the register of associations. While the KG assumed that the operation of the daycare centers made the association a non-registrable economic association and that the general purpose of child care and education was not relevant, the BGH took a different view. In the opinion of the BGH, the operation of the daycare centers is covered by the so-called secondary purpose privilege, according to which an economic activity is permissible if it does not become the main purpose of the association but serves this purpose.
The Federal Court of Justice attributed an indicative effect to the recognition of the association as a non-profit organization to the fact that the actual purpose of the association was not an economic one, but the idealistic purpose of promoting education and youth counseling. Accordingly, the association may continue to be registered in the register of associations.

Relevance for practice – need for action
According to the decision of the Federal Court of Justice, in the future, when assessing the registrability of associations, it is primarily the purpose defined in the articles of association and not the actual economic activity that is important. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the formulation of the articles of association and the purpose of the association not only with regard to the recognition of non-profit status, but now also for the registration and legal capacity.
Conversely, for associations that are not recognized as non-profit, the BGH’s decision is likely to mean that it will be even more difficult for them in future to be entered in the register of associations and thus to acquire legal capacity. However, this could be remedied by the reform of associations as part of the legislative process currently underway “to facilitate entrepreneurial initiatives arising from civic engagement.” This procedure is to be completed before the end of this legislative period and, in particular, will re-regulate the economic association.

Irrespective of the fact that non-profit daycare center associations can be legally and registrable after all and that there will also be simplifications for the economic association in the future, the question still remains in practice whether the legal form of the association is always the best legal form for the operation of daycare centers or other facilities. Recently, the legal form of the non-profit limited liability company (GmbH) has become more and more common. Which legal form is the right one, however, remains to be examined in each individual case. If necessary, a change of legal form from a registered association to a limited liability company (gGmbH) may also prove useful.

We will be happy to assist you in drafting the articles of association as well as any necessary amendments. We will also be happy to advise you on the question of the appropriate legal form and any necessary change of form, as well as on any other questions you may have.

Explore #more

12.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Focus offshore: NRW buys extensive tax data on international tax havens

According to recent press reports from December 11, 2025, the state of North Rhine-Westphalia has purchased an extensive data set with tax-relevant information from international…

12.12.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises The Chemours Company on the implementation and closing of a large-volume factoring financing

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft GmbH (KPMG Law) advised the US-American Chemours Company on the implementation of a cross-border factoring financing. The legal implementation was managed by…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

Negotiators from the EU Parliament and the Council have now reached an agreement on the outstanding points of the first omnibus package. The content of…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

IPCEI-AI: Requirements for funding and evaluation criteria

On December 5, 2025, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy launched the expression of interest procedure for the “IPCEI Artificial Intelligence” (IPCEI-AI) funding…

11.12.2025 | In the media

Interview in TextilWirtschaft – What the relaxed EU supply chain law means for the industry

After weeks of debate, the weakened form of the CSDDD has now been adopted in Brussels. This brings new, complex legal uncertainties for companies, says…

02.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementation of the Pay Transparency Directive: what the expert commission recommends

The EU Pay Transparency Directive has been in force since June 2023 and must now be transposed into German law. In the coalition agreement,…

28.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest article Expert forum on employment law: Between theory and practice: The EU Blue Card and the right to short-term mobility within the EU

Nowadays, not only employees but also employers want to create more attractive working conditions. For some time now, so-called workstations / work-from-anywhere programs or other…

26.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

EU deforestation regulation forces companies to act

Anyone who trades in or uses the raw materials soy, oil palm, cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber and wood and certain products made from them should…

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

Contact

Dr. Claudia Nerius

Senior Manager

Münzgasse 2
04107 Leipzig

Tel.: +49 341 - 225 72 525
cnerius@kpmg-law.com

Mark Uwe Pawlytta

Partner
Head of Succession and Foundation Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195012
mpawlytta@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll