Search
Contact
04.07.2017 | KPMG Law Insights

Breathing a sigh of relief for non-profit daycare associations: legal and registration capability exists

Breathing a sigh of relief for non-profit daycare associations: legal and registration capability exists

In its decision of May 16, 2017, Case No.: II ZB 7/16, the Federal Supreme Court overturned the “Kita case law” practiced by the Kammergericht since 2011. This was expected by very few people.

“Kita Jurisprudence” of the Superior Court of Justice
In recent years, the Kammergericht (KG) has repeatedly ruled that non-profit associations that operate day care centers for children are not eligible for registration and thus do not have legal capacity. For the KG, the associations are mainly aimed at economic business operations due to the operation of the daycare centers and are therefore not to be classified as non-material associations within the meaning of Section 21 of the German Civil Code (BGB). This case law has been welcomed in the literature and is considered to be consistent and in line with the protection of creditors.

Decision of the BGH of May 16, 2017
Now, in the case of a Berlin association that operates nine daycare centers, each with 16 to 32 children, the BGH has overturned the ordered deletion of the association from the register of associations. While the KG assumed that the operation of the daycare centers made the association a non-registrable economic association and that the general purpose of child care and education was not relevant, the BGH took a different view. In the opinion of the BGH, the operation of the daycare centers is covered by the so-called secondary purpose privilege, according to which an economic activity is permissible if it does not become the main purpose of the association but serves this purpose.
The Federal Court of Justice attributed an indicative effect to the recognition of the association as a non-profit organization to the fact that the actual purpose of the association was not an economic one, but the idealistic purpose of promoting education and youth counseling. Accordingly, the association may continue to be registered in the register of associations.

Relevance for practice – need for action
According to the decision of the Federal Court of Justice, in the future, when assessing the registrability of associations, it is primarily the purpose defined in the articles of association and not the actual economic activity that is important. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the formulation of the articles of association and the purpose of the association not only with regard to the recognition of non-profit status, but now also for the registration and legal capacity.
Conversely, for associations that are not recognized as non-profit, the BGH’s decision is likely to mean that it will be even more difficult for them in future to be entered in the register of associations and thus to acquire legal capacity. However, this could be remedied by the reform of associations as part of the legislative process currently underway “to facilitate entrepreneurial initiatives arising from civic engagement.” This procedure is to be completed before the end of this legislative period and, in particular, will re-regulate the economic association.

Irrespective of the fact that non-profit daycare center associations can be legally and registrable after all and that there will also be simplifications for the economic association in the future, the question still remains in practice whether the legal form of the association is always the best legal form for the operation of daycare centers or other facilities. Recently, the legal form of the non-profit limited liability company (GmbH) has become more and more common. Which legal form is the right one, however, remains to be examined in each individual case. If necessary, a change of legal form from a registered association to a limited liability company (gGmbH) may also prove useful.

We will be happy to assist you in drafting the articles of association as well as any necessary amendments. We will also be happy to advise you on the question of the appropriate legal form and any necessary change of form, as well as on any other questions you may have.

Explore #more

26.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

EU deforestation regulation forces companies to act

Anyone who trades in or uses the raw materials soy, oil palm, cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber and wood and certain products made from them should…

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

21.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Residential construction turbo: more living space on existing properties

Since October 30, 2025, new regulations on the creation of living space have been in force in the German Building Code (BauGB). At the heart…

19.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

New Packaging Implementation Act tightens obligations for companies

With a new Packaging Implementation Act (VerpackDG), German law is to be adapted to the EU Packaging Regulation. The Federal Ministry for the Environment…

18.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the FAZ on the subject of deepfakes

Fraudsters can easily falsify invoices or even act as company bosses. Companies can defend themselves against this, but there are no miracle weapons against AI…

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

Contact

Dr. Claudia Nerius

Senior Manager

Münzgasse 2
04107 Leipzig

Tel.: +49 341 - 225 72 525
cnerius@kpmg-law.com

Mark Uwe Pawlytta

Partner
Head of Succession and Foundation Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195012
mpawlytta@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll