Search
Contact
Symbolbild zu Überstundenzuschlägen von Teilzeitbeschäftigten: Wecker neben Laptop
17.12.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

BAG: Part-time employees can also claim overtime pay

If full-time employees are entitled to overtime pay from the first hour of overtime, this must also apply to part-time employees, the Federal Labor Court (BAG) has ruled (judgment of December 5, 2024 – Ref. 8 AZR 370/20 – previously only available as a press release). A collective agreement provision according to which employees only receive overtime pay if they exceed the working hours of a full-time employee, regardless of their individual working hours, discriminates against part-time employees. In the specific case, the plaintiff is employed with a capacity of 40 percent. Her employment relationship is governed by a collective agreement concluded between the employer and the trade union ver.di. According to this agreement, overtime is subject to a surcharge. However, the collective agreement only defines overtime as hours that exceed the monthly working hours of a full-time employee. According to the collective agreement, full-time working hours are 38.5 hours per week. Part-time employees have therefore rarely benefited from overtime bonuses if they have worked more than their individual weekly working hours.

Part-time employees are entitled to remuneration in proportion to their working hours

The BAG had referred the question to the ECJ as to whether the collective bargaining regulation violated EU law. The ECJ affirmed this and answered the question in its ruling of July 24, 2024(C-184/22 and C-185/22) as follows The collective agreement regulation violates both Directive 97/81/EC on part-time work and the Equal Treatment Directive (2006/54/EC), as considerably more women than men were affected by the regulation. The ECJ had argued in the reference that overtime pay was regulated equally for all employees, in that everyone was entitled to the supplement if the limit of 38.5 hours was exceeded. However, part-time employees have to work a larger number of overtime hours without a supplement, while full-time employees can claim a supplement from the first overtime hour. This is inadmissible unequal treatment. The remuneration of part-time employees must correspond proportionately to their working hours to that of comparable full-time employees. Unequal treatment can be justified by objective reasons. However, the BAG did not see an objective reason. In particular, the BAG does not appear to follow the argument that a burden justifying the overtime bonus can only be assumed once the working hours applicable to full-time employees have been exceeded. The BAG awarded the plaintiff a time credit in the amount of the overtime premium as well as compensation for indirect discrimination on the basis of gender.

How employers should react to the BAG ruling

Until now, it has not been unusual for overtime bonuses to be paid only for hours worked in excess of the regular working hours of full-time employees. Corresponding regulations can often be found in collective agreements. From now on, they should apply the same standards for calculating overtime bonuses for their part-time employees as for full-time employees, i.e. they must be granted a bonus from the first hour of overtime in relation to their individual working hours if this is also the case for comparable full-time employees. Part-time employees can often be inadvertently discriminated against. There is a risk that part-time employees are unjustifiably disadvantaged not only in terms of pay, but also in terms of vacation arrangements, the allocation of tasks and access to company facilities. The discrimination of part-time employees is prohibited under Section 4 (1) TzBfG. If employers do not comply with the equal treatment requirement, they risk legal action. If the part-time employees are predominantly women, this may also constitute discrimination on grounds of gender and trigger a claim for compensation pursuant to Section 15 (2) AGG.

 

Explore #more

10.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law guest article in NZG: Compliance due diligence in SMEs: Minimum scope and contractual mapping of compliance risks of the target company

In the context of M&A transactions, compliance usually still plays a subordinate role in legal due diligence. The purpose of this article is, on…

10.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law honored at the M&A Award Night 2025

KPMG Law has been awarded the “M&A Transaction Advisory” prize at this year’s M&A Award Night of the Bundesverband Mergers & Acquisitions e.V. (BM&A) and…

10.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law guest article in CCZ: The guide for compliance management systems in small and medium-sized enterprises (DIN SPEC 91524)

Compliance in SMEs is challenging: the legal responsibility for compliance is undisputed, but the specific tasks are unclear and depend on the specific situation of…

10.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Transformation in legal departments in 2026 – the most important trends and best practices

Three topics in particular are currently driving the transformation of the legal department: AI, the rapid increase in regulation and geopolitical developments. There has always…

08.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG advised Adiuva Capital GmbH with Fact Books on the sale of KONZMANN Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Adiuva Capital GmbH, a Hamburg-based private equity firm (“Adiuva“), in connection with the…

06.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the Green Claims Directive means for companies – an overview

With the Green Claims Directive, the EU will introduce extensive regulations on the requirements for permissible environmental claims. The aim is to prevent greenwashing so…

03.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG support the restructuring of Groupe CAT in Germany

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Groupe CAT on comprehensive restructuring measures with a cross-service team. Over a period of…

02.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises Epitype GmbH and MDG Molecular Diagnostics Group GmbH on the acquisition of significant assets of oncgnostics GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided comprehensive legal advice to Epitype GmbH, a company of the Dresden-based MDG Group, on the formation and subsequent…

02.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in ZEIT for entrepreneurs: We’ll take the 500 billion!

German construction companies are asking themselves: how quickly will the money come from the government? And they are worried that only the giants will benefit.…

01.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Network Agency reforms special network charges for industry and commerce

The Federal Network Agency is planning a fundamental reform of the special network charges for energy-intensive companies. Any change to the current privilege regime entails…

Contact

Dr. Martin Trayer

Partner

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: 49 69 951195565
mtrayer@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll