Search
Contact
19.12.2024 | Press releases

KPMG Law defends Federal Motor Transport Authority against claim for damages in connection with the emissions scandal

The state is not liable to vehicle purchasers for damages. KPMG Law has defended the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) against a civil plaintiff’s state liability claim in connection with the so-called emissions scandal before the Higher Regional Court of Schleswig (Case No. 11 U 61/24). KPMG Law had already successfully represented the Federal Motor Transport Authority in the first instance (Flensburg Regional Court, judgment of August 23, 2024, case no. 2 O 37/24). The plaintiff had made a claim against the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by the KBA as the type approval authority for motor vehicles. He accused the authority of not having adequately monitored the vehicle manufacturers and of having issued the type approval for his vehicle incorrectly. He based his claim on an alleged breach of the KBA’s supervisory duties in connection with the emissions scandal. In addition, the plaintiff complained about the KBA’s failure to take action against the thermal window used by the manufacturer of his vehicle. Last year, the ECJ (Case C-100/21) and subsequently also the BGH (VIa ZR 335/21) ruled that claims for damages by vehicle buyers against manufacturers are not excluded per se if a thermal window is used. From this, the plaintiff drew the conclusion that claims for damages against the state must also exist. The Flensburg Regional Court and, at second instance, the Schleswig Higher Regional Court have clearly denied this.

 

No protective obligations of the Federal Motor Transport Authority towards vehicle purchasers on the basis of type approval law

Neither court saw any basis for a claim under state liability law. The plaintiff’s interest in preventing the conclusion of an unwanted contract was not covered by the protective purpose of type approval law. The alleged risk of decommissioning or prohibition of operation of the vehicle cited by the plaintiff was also clearly remote, especially since both the purchase of the vehicle by the plaintiff and the discovery of software manipulations by some vehicle manufacturers were more than eight years ago. The most recent case law of the ECJ and BGH referred to by the plaintiff does not change this. The 11th Senate at the Higher Regional Court of Schleswig informed the plaintiff that it unanimously assumed that the appeal was obviously unsuccessful. The plaintiff then withdrew his appeal.

 

Advisor:inside KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law):

Dr. Simon Meyer (partner, lead, Munich), Dr. Florian Gonsior (co-lead, senior manager, Düsseldorf), Vera Boes, Dr. Sandro Köpper (both senior associates, Hanover)

 

Explore #more

06.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the Green Claims Directive means for companies – an overview

With the Green Claims Directive, the EU will introduce extensive regulations on the requirements for permissible environmental claims. The aim is to prevent greenwashing so…

03.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG support the restructuring of Groupe CAT in Germany

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Groupe CAT on comprehensive restructuring measures with a cross-service team. Over a period of…

02.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises Epitype GmbH and MDG Molecular Diagnostics Group GmbH on the acquisition of significant assets of oncgnostics GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided comprehensive legal advice to Epitype GmbH, a company of the Dresden-based MDG Group, on the formation and subsequent…

02.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in ZEIT for entrepreneurs: We’ll take the 500 billion!

German construction companies are asking themselves: how quickly will the money come from the government? And they are worried that only the giants will benefit.…

01.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Network Agency reforms special network charges for industry and commerce

The Federal Network Agency is planning a fundamental reform of the special network charges for energy-intensive companies. Any change to the current privilege regime entails…

30.09.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law dominates the top 100 list of the new law firm monitor with eight lawyers

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) occupies an outstanding sixth place in the overall evaluation of the TOP 100 law firms in the current diruj…

29.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

MiSpeL draft: New funding for energy storage systems and charging points

On September 18, 2025, the Federal Network Agency published a draft for the “Market integration of storage systems and charging points” (MiSpeL for short). For…

29.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Organizing the transformation and spin-off of corporate real estate with legal certainty

When real estate portfolios are to be transformed or spun off, the economic success depends heavily on the legal preparation. Complex legal issues often arise,…

25.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

MaGo update – roadmap for implementing the new requirements

On 14 July 2025, BaFin revised the circular “Minimum requirements for the business organization of insurance companies under Solvency II” (MaGo for SII-VU) and published…

25.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Foundation register – launch to be postponed from 2026 to 2028

The reform of foundation law, which came into force in July 2023, created a nationwide foundation register based on the commercial register. This was actually

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll