Search
Contact
13.01.2015 | KPMG Law Insights

Investment Law – Investment | Law | Compact – Issue 1/2015

Dear Readers,

regulation continues to dominate the picture at the beginning of the new year. Just before Christmas, ESMA published its final recommendations for the Level 2 measures of MiFID II.

Asset managers have also been hit hard. We have therefore focused on ESMA’s extensive elaboration in this issue.

But European supervisors are also active elsewhere. You have taken on another UCITS issue. Objective: To harmonize supervisory practice on share classes in Europe.

We wish you a good and successful 2015.

With best regards
Henning Brockhaus

 

ESMA

ESMA publishes final draft of Commission delegated regulation on MiFID II/MiFIR

On December 19, 2014, ESMA published its final recommendations to the EU Commission (Final Report – ESMA’s Technical Adivce to the Commission on MiFID II and MiFIR) for Level II regulations. Compared to the Consultation Paper of May 22, 2014, the European Securities and Markets Authority has addressed the issue of grants in particular. We present a selection of the essential points:

Negative list for quality improvement remains

Despite critical voices, ESMA maintains a non-exhaustive list of cases in which there are no improvements in the quality of service and thus inducements should not be permitted.

“Factual ban on commissions” deleted

Compared to the Consultation Paper of May 2014, ESMA has moved away from the prohibition of using benefits for the purposes of own business operations. This had been attacked from many sides as a de facto ban on commissions.

Examples of service improvement

On the other hand, ESMA also requires concrete benefits for clients, provided that benefits are granted. ESMA provides examples of additional services that could represent a tangible improvement in quality, for example, higher quality investment advice. However, the amount of the grants must always be proportionate to the improvement in service quality.

Research generally covered by the concept of a donation

In the Authority’s view, research services do not qualify as a gratuity only if the investment firm funds research through its own resources or – under certain conditions – funds it through a separate account for research services.

Recommendations on trade topics

In addition to the Final Report, ESMA has published another Consultation Paper on MiFID II/MiFIR. This paper deals in particular with topics related to trading in financial instruments.

Conclusion and challenges

ESMA’s revised Technical Advice will also pose significant challenges to the asset management industry. In our view, current business models need to be reviewed and new paths analyzed. This also affects other areas such as the new regulations on product governance and cost transparency.

KPMG Law will be happy to investigate for you to what extent and in which positions, processes and legal relationships your company is affected by the above-mentioned changes. We will be happy to support you in implementing the new regulations.

Please also visit our MiFID2 website.

Here you can find the Final Report of December 19, 2015, the Consultation Paper and its Annex B.

ESMA

Consultation Paper for Guidelines on Asset Segregation under AIFMD

On December 1, 2014, ESMA published a consultation paper on asset segregation in sub-custody under AIFMD. In this context, ESMA provides a choice of two possible options for asset segregation in the case of sub-custody, both of which are intended to be compliant with the AIFMD:

  • Option 1: The sub-custodian may hold such assets of multiple AIFs of multiple AIFMs in a single account (omnibus account) entrusted to it by a single depositary for sub-custody.
  • Option 2: The sub-custodian may hold all assets of all AIFs of all AIFMs in a single omnibus account, even if they have been entrusted to it for sub-custody by several custodians.

For both options, the sub-custodian must segregate the entrusted assets of the AIF from other assets (own assets, assets of other clients, own asset of the depositary).

ESMA is making these options available for consultation until January 30, 2015. Alternatively, suggestions for further segregation models can be made.

ESMA’s consultation paper with the details can be found here.

ESMA

ESMA publishes discussion paper on share classes

ESMA presented a discussion paper on unit classes for UCITS on December 23, 2014. The aim is to counteract different interpretations of the concept of unit class among the Member States and to achieve harmonization of administrative practice.

In addition to the definition of the term unit class, ESMA lists three criteria for possible unit classes:

  • All unit classes of a UCITS shall pursue the same investment strategy,
  • Particular characteristics of a unit class shall not have a potentially or actually detrimental influence on another unit class of the same UCITS, and
  • Differences between unit classes of a UCITS shall be disclosed to investors if investors may choose between at least two unit classes.

For further clarification, ESMA has developed two non-exhaustive lists of share classes that are compatible with the three criteria and those that should not be permitted under them.

The discussion paper can be found here.

EU LEGISLATION

Regulation on key information documents for packaged retail investment products and insurance investment products (PRIIPs)

On December 9, 2014, the PRIIPs Regulation was published in the EU Official Journal. The aim of the regulation is to create a uniform information standard for all packaged investment products.

In future, every retail investor will receive a basic information sheet of no more than three pages for packaged investment products. This must contain, among other things, the most important features of the respective products, in particular their risks and costs.

UCITS and certain AIFs for which a member state applies the provisions of the UCITS Directive on the so-called “Key Investors Documents” (KID) when marketing to investors are exempt from the obligations of the PRIIPs Regulation for a transitional period until December 31, 2019.

The PRIIPs Regulation can be found here.

ESA

ESAs publish discussion paper on PRIIPs

Already on November 17, 2014, the three European supervisory authorities ESMA, EBA and EIOPA (together European Supervisory Authorities, ESAs) published a joint 114-page discussion paper on PRIIPs, which in particular specifies the contents and presentation of the new basic information sheet. In this context, the discussion paper primarily addresses the presentation of risk and return as well as the disclosure of costs.

The discussion paper can be found here.

Explore #more

02.04.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Building Modernization Act (GMG): What is now important for companies

The planned Building Modernization Act (GMG) is set to replace significant parts of the previous Building Energy Act (GEG). Companies in the real estate industry,…

01.04.2026 | In the media

Manager Magazin: KPMG Law in first place for legal advice

Every two years, Manager Magazin, together with the Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Management und Beratung (WGMB), awards Germany’s best auditors with a “Best-in-Class” seal and evaluates

27.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Special Infrastructure Fund and State Aid Law: Orientation for Funding Practice and Planning

The special fund “Infrastructure and Climate Neutrality” (SVIK) also entails considerable responsibility under state aid law for federal states, municipalities and recipients of funds. Anyone

23.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law, KPMG Law AT as well as KPMG in Germany and KPMG in Austria advise GOLDBECK GmbH on the acquisition of 50 percent of the shares in ZAUNERGROUP Holding GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and Buchberger Ettmayer Rechtsanwälte GmbH (KPMG Law AT) as well as KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG in Germany) and KPMG…

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

Contact

Henning Brockhaus

Partner

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195061
hbrockhaus@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll