Search
Contact
15.02.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

Critical infrastructure and investment control – caution in corporate transactions

Critical infrastructure and investment control – caution in corporate transactions

Anyone buying or selling shares in a company that operates critical infrastructure should be careful. This is because an investment control procedure may have to be carried out before the acquisition. Failure to do so may result in fines and imprisonment.

The background is: For decades, the global economy has grown together. However, a trend called decoupling has been emerging for several years. World powers are beginning to close off from each other, such as the U.S. and China. At the latest since the start of the war in Ukraine, there has been growing concern in Germany that important infrastructure will no longer be available.

To protect the population from a failure of this so-called critical infrastructure, the federal government has taken precautions. One of these is that services of general interest should remain within the EU.

For non-EU companies, this means that they cannot easily buy company shares in a critical infrastructure operator. If a buyer based outside the EU (or outside the EFTA area) wishes to acquire at least 10% of the voting rights in such a company, so-called investment control applies to protect public order and security. This means that the purchase of the shares must be reported in advance to the Federal Ministry of Economics and Climate Protection (BMWK). The BMWK examines the planned participation and approves it (if necessary, subject to conditions) or prohibits it.

 

How many companies fall under critical infrastructure is often underestimated

It is often underestimated how many company acquisitions now fall under the obligation to report to the BMWK. The German Federal Office for Information Security (BSIG) defines critical infrastructure in this way:

Critical infrastructures (CRITIS) are facilities, installations or parts thereof that belong to the sectors of

  • Energy
  • Information technology and telecommunications
  • Transportation and traffic
  • Health
  • Water
  • Nutrition
  • Finance and insurance or
  • Municipal waste management

and are of great importance to the functioning of the community because their failure or impairment would result in significant supply bottlenecks or threats to public safety.

 

Above a defined threshold, installations are considered critical

The reporting obligation does not apply to all companies in the sectors mentioned. This is only the case above certain thresholds. The basic rule for all sectors is that the plant must be capable of serving at least half a million people to be considered critical. The Ordinance on the Determination of Critical Infrastructures (BSI-KritisV) specifies when this is assumed in each case for each sector individually. For example, a food manufacturer is currently part of the critical infrastructure if it produces 434,500 tons of food or 350 million liters of beverages. For prescription drugs, the threshold is 4.65 million packages placed on the market per year. A normal generator is considered critical when it produces 104 megawatts of electricity. For certain energy suppliers, the threshold is even lower or non-existent.

Important: These thresholds are always adjusted. It was not until the beginning of 2022 that the thresholds were lowered significantly in some sectors.

 

Caution also in other industries and in restructurings

Even if at first glance the buyer belongs to an EU member state or the target company does not operate critical infrastructure, close scrutiny is required. This is because a number of other transactions may also be reportable under the German government’s Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance (AWV). This includes the following constellations:

  • In addition to critical infrastructure, there are other industries where investments may be reportable. These are defined in § 55a para. 1 AWV listed. Examples of such industries include aerospace, media, and cybersecurity, as well as certain high technologies, such as robotics, quantum, nuclear, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence. The catalog was again significantly expanded with the AWV amendment in 2021.
  • Even intra-group restructurings can fall within the scope of investment control if the (intra-group) new acquiring company is a non-EU company.
  • Not only the initial investment, but also the increase of an existing investment may be reportable.
  • Cases are also conceivable in which the investment must be registered even though the acquirer is from the European Union. This may be the case if the acquirer itself has shareholders from non-EU member states.

 

Violations may result in fines and imprisonment

If the reporting requirement is overlooked and a transaction is completed, this can result in significant sanctions. These include, in particular, the invalidity of the underlying contract and its execution, heavy fines and even prison sentences of up to five years.

 

What should companies do?

It is not always easy for companies to determine whether a transaction needs to be reported. Mistakes, and thus penalties, lurk in many places. Complicating matters further is the fact that the conditions for mandatory reporting may well be changed at short notice and the thresholds for investment control further lowered, as has already happened in the recent past.

Companies from non-EU member states in particular are therefore well advised to have any acquisition of shares checked by a lawyer in advance.

Sufficient time should be allowed for the investment review. As a rule, the procedure at the BMWK takes two months. In individual cases, however, it can take up to eight months.

Explore #more

11.03.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview with HAUFE: LkSG after the elections – everything new?

Many companies have made considerable efforts to implement the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act. The political discussion about its abolition is now causing uncertainty. KPMG…

07.03.2025 | In the media

Guest article in unternehmensjurist: Implementing the requirements of the BFSG correctly

The Barrier-Free Accessibility Reinforcement Act requires companies to offer certain products and services without barriers. The obligations vary depending on the role in business transactions.…

05.03.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in TextilWirtschaft: What the changes from Brussels mean for the fashion industry

It’s now official: the EU Commission will massively simplify the planned sustainability reporting. The Supply Chain Law Initiative examines the announced changes to the CSDDD…

28.02.2025 | In the media

KPMG LLP Launches KPMG Law US – The First Big Four Law Firm Serving The US Market

The Supreme Court of the US state of Arizona has granted KPMG US the license for KPMG Law US. As of February 27, 2025, KPMG…

27.02.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the ESGZ: The current opinion

Is the German Supply Chain Act sufficient to hold companies accountable, or do we need stricter liability rules for human rights and environmental violations? KPMG…

26.02.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First Omnibus Package to relax the obligations of the CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy

The EU Commission has today published the draft of the first announced Omnibus Package. With the first directive as part of the omnibus initiative,…

24.02.2025 |

Digitization of administration – the digital driver’s license is a first step

The introduction of digital driver’s licenses and vehicle documents recently approved by the Federal Cabinet marks a significant milestone in the digitalization of modern administration.…

21.02.2025 | In the media

Guest article in Betriebs Berater: Overview of regulation for securities institutions

Since the Securities Institutions Act (WpIG) came into force on June 26, 2021, securities institutions have had their own supervisory regime. In addition to the…

21.02.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Money laundering prevention: BaFin calls on financial sector to act

The German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) is calling on the financial sector to pay greater attention to money laundering prevention. In its report “Risks…

18.02.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AI compliance: important legal aspects at a glance

Human intelligence draws on experience, emotion and intuition. Artificial intelligence (AI), on the other hand, processes vast amounts of data in fractions of a second.…

Contact

Dr. Gerrit Rixen

Partner
Head of Antitrust and Investment Control

Barbarossaplatz 1a
50674 Köln

Tel.: +49 221 2716891052
grixen@kpmg-law.com

Christoph Gröne

Manager

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

Tel.: 0211 4155597-763
cgroene@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll