Search
Contact
Symbolbild zu Duschen kann Arbeitszeit sein: Fabrikarbeiter
18.10.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

BAG: Showering can be working time

Can showering be working time? The Federal Labor Court had to decide on this question (BAG, judgment of April 23, 2024 – 5 AZR 212/23). The answer is: Body cleansing is part of working time if employees get so dirty during their work that they cannot otherwise be expected to put on their private clothes and walk home. Whether these conditions are met, however, depends on the individual case. In the case decided here, the plaintiff was employed as a container mechanic. His work included sanding down rusty and damaged areas and painting work. The employer did provide him with protective clothing. Nevertheless, the employee often got so dirty at work that he first washed or showered in the changing rooms provided by the employer before putting on his private clothes and going home. These times were not remunerated by the employer.

Showering can count as working time, as can changing and travel times within the company

The time required to put on and take off work clothes and the associated travel time between the changing room and the workplace has already been classified as working time in previous case law. This applies in particular if the work clothing is prescribed by the employer and is only to be worn in the company. The BAG is now following these principles. According to this, body cleaning times can also constitute working time subject to remuneration if they are directly related to the actual activity or the manner in which it is performed and therefore serve exclusively to satisfy an external need. This is undoubtedly the case if the employer expressly orders personal cleaning or if mandatory occupational health and safety regulations require it. However, time spent cleaning the body is also part of the working time subject to remuneration if the employee becomes so dirty during the performance of their work that they cannot reasonably be expected to put on their private clothing, leave the company and go home without first cleaning their body. This applies regardless of whether the employee uses local public transport or their own car. However, the court emphasized that the soiling must go beyond “normal soiling”. Sweat and body odor generated during the day were not sufficient in the opinion of the BAG.

Employers can make company regulations for personal cleaning times

The BAG decision initially confirms the previous case law on changing and travel times. Whether personal cleaning times can also be paid working time had not yet been decided by the highest court. The BAG has now provided clarity here. However, whether and for which activities the obligation to pay remuneration actually applies in individual cases depends on the specific circumstances. One thing is certain: The soiling must be severe and go beyond the usual soiling, sweat and body odor of the day. It should also be clear that only the minimum time required to clean the body can be counted as working time. Employees will still have to carry out special cleaning or personal hygiene rituals in their free time. Employers should keep an eye on the further development of this case law and, depending on the industry, make their own contractual or collective regulations as to when cleaning times count as working time and how they are remunerated. According to the current decision of the Federal Labor Court, it is still possible to provide for lower remuneration for changing, commuting and personal cleaning times than for the original work activity or to define appropriate flat rates. Appropriate consideration should also be given in duty rosters and shift schedules.

 

Explore #more

28.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest article Expert forum on employment law: Between theory and practice: The EU Blue Card and the right to short-term mobility within the EU

Nowadays, not only employees but also employers want to create more attractive working conditions. For some time now, so-called workstations / work-from-anywhere programs or other…

26.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

EU deforestation regulation forces companies to act

Anyone who trades in or uses the raw materials soy, oil palm, cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber and wood and certain products made from them should…

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

21.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Residential construction turbo: more living space on existing properties

Since October 30, 2025, new regulations on the creation of living space have been in force in the German Building Code (BauGB). At the heart…

19.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

New Packaging Implementation Act tightens obligations for companies

With a new Packaging Implementation Act (VerpackDG), German law is to be adapted to the EU Packaging Regulation. The Federal Ministry for the Environment…

18.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the FAZ on the subject of deepfakes

Fraudsters can easily falsify invoices or even act as company bosses. Companies can defend themselves against this, but there are no miracle weapons against AI…

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

Contact

Dr. Martin Trayer

Partner

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: 49 69 951195565
mtrayer@kpmg-law.com

Nora Matthaei, LL.M. (Cape Town)

Senior Manager

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195 922
nmatthaei@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll