Search
Contact
08.05.2019 | KPMG Law Insights

Company pension plan – difference for new pension commitments in the year of publication of new mortality tables

Difference in the case of new pension commitments in the year of publication of new mortality tables (BFH, decision dated February 13, 2019, XI R 34/16)

Christine Hansen and Jean-Baptiste Abel

The plaintiff was a limited liability company (GmbH) that issued a pension commitment to its shareholder managing director in November 2005. The amount reported does not include any additional amount due to the changes in the Heubeck 2005 mortality tables, which were applicable for the first time in 2005, compared with the Heubeck 1998 mortality tables. The tax office assumed that a difference based on the first-time application of the 2005 mortality tables would also have to be spread over three years in the year of the first commitment.
The BFH ruled that no distribution was to be made. The wording of the provision in § 6a para. 4 sentence 2 EStG requires a difference between the partial value of the pension obligation at the end of the fiscal year and at the end of the previous fiscal year. There is no difference when a pension provision is initially recognized. A distribution of the difference is therefore not possible in assessment periods in which a pension commitment is made. The purpose of the provision does not permit any other result either, as it cannot be inferred from the legislative materials that the provision is intended to be applied beyond the wording also to cases of the first-time formation of a pension provision. The BFH thus rejects the opinion of the BMF most recently expressed in the BMF letter of October 19, 2018 (para. 2 therein) that the transfer must take place uniformly for all pension obligations.

Conclusion: Remarkably, the BFH does not base its decision on the fact that the commitment was made after the publication of the new 2015 mortality tables. The decision is thus likely to apply to all new commitments made in the year of the new board’s publication – regardless of whether they were made before or after its publication. The decisive factor should be that a provision was recognized for the first time at the end of the year in question. The decision is particularly topical due to the fact that the 2018 G Heubeck mortality tables were published last year.

Explore #more

27.03.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

EU Buildings Directive: life cycle greenhouse potential becomes relevant

On March 12, 2024, the EU Parliament approved the amendment to the EU Buildings Directive. The directive obliges member states and, indirectly, building owners and…

19.03.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, KPMG Law Insights

CSDDD: Provisional agreement on the EU Supply Chain Directive

The EU member states agreed on the CSDDD, the EU Supply Chain Directive, on March 15, 2024. Germany abstained from the vote. Negotiators from the…

19.03.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The AI Act is coming: EU wants to get a grip on AI risks

For many people, artificial intelligence (AI) is the great hope for business, healthcare and science. But there are also plenty of critics who fear the…

21.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The Digital Services Act – what does it mean for companies?

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a key component of the EU’s digital strategy and came into force on November 16, 2022. As a regulation,…

15.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Data compliance management: How to implement it in practice

Part 3 of the article series “Professional tips for data compliance management”   The third part of this series of articles deals with data compliance

14.02.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, PR Publications

Guest article in ZURe: Monitoring the implementation of the LkSG

The current issue of ZURe (p. 20 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Law Partner Thomas Uhlig (Head of General Business and Commercial Law),…

09.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: The employment law function

In almost all German companies, the employment law function is located in the HR department and not in the legal department. One of the reasons…

01.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: Fair play in eSports

eSports is a billion-dollar market that is growing rapidly. This makes it all the more important for the economic players involved to comply with applicable…

24.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new unitary patent works – ten facts

The new unitary patent can be applied for at the European Patent Office (EPO) from June 1, 2023. The Implementing Regulations and the Schedule of

22.01.2024 | PR Publications

Guest article in the Börsen-Zeitung on the subject of EU antitrust regulations

Agreements with competitors on sustainability efforts may violate antitrust law. Which legal interest should then take precedence? KPMG Law expert Jonas Brueckner discusses this question…

Contact

Christine Hansen

Senior Manager

Klingelhöferstraße 18
10785 Berlin

tel: +49 30 530199150
christinehansen@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll