Search
Contact
31.10.2014 | KPMG Law Insights

GWK decides to continue existing science pacts

Dear Readers,

as the political education, research and funding landscape has also become extremely active in the last quarter of this year, this newsletter also thrives on reports around education and research. Take a look at our articles for news on higher education policy, innovations in the funding area, and the results of a study commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research on the study situation and student orientation.

We had the impression that those of you who are interested in procurement law have been somewhat neglected so far. Therefore, the focus of this newsletter is on public procurement law with new and exciting decisions from case law that are important for universities and research institutions.

We would very much appreciate your feedback on the areas we have covered so far – are these sufficient for you in the context of your daily work? Are there possibly any topics you would like to have discussed as well? Do not hesitate and feel free to call us about it or write a short feedback by mail.

We wish you interesting reading!

Sincerely yours

Public Sector Team of KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

Mathias Oberndörfer Dr. Anke Empting

Lawyer Attorney

On October 30, 2014, the Joint Science Conference of the Federal Government and the Länder (GWK) agreed on the continuation of the Higher Education Pact, the DFG program allowances and the Pact for Research and Innovation until 2020.

Provided that the heads of government of the federal and state governments give their final approval at their meeting on December 11, 2014, the main funding programs with a funding volume of EUR 25.3 billion will move into the next funding phase. One focus will again be the so-called Excellence Initiative.

Interim balance of the latest meeting on the Excellence Initiative in Bad Honnef

At the largest-ever joint meeting of the graduate schools, clusters of excellence and institutional strategies funded on the basis of the Excellence Initiative, initiated by the DFG and the German Council of Science and Humanities in early October 2014, the participants unanimously drew a positive conclusion and made an urgent appeal to policymakers to further develop and continue the program.

He said that the Excellence Initiative had provided a wide range of impetus to the German science system and had also made German universities much more attractive internationally as places of top research and starting points for innovation. These successes must be built on, for which a rapid fundamental decision by the federal and state governments on continuation is an indispensable prerequisite.

Submission of the German science ministers on the extension of the initiative

Even after the current funding phase ends in 2017, there will be money for top German research, just as much as under the current Excellence Initiative, which will have granted around four billion euros for exceptional scientific achievements by 2017. How the funding will look in the future is still open and depends on the results of the investigations of an evaluation commission expected in January 2016.

Dispute over the financing of the program flat rate

A dispute has erupted over the distribution of costs for funding research between the federal government and the states; specifically, it is about the costs of the so-called program lump sum, which have so far been borne by the federal government, something the Federal Audit Office criticized last year. Since then, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research has been calling for the states to participate – so far without success.

Currently, the basic funding of many research projects is provided by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The DFG also grants the so-called program lump sum (20 percent of the project costs) to cover the additional costs incurred. Depending on the department, however, 40 to 70 percent would be required, according to university rectors.

In contrast, research at non-university institutions is fully cost-financed. In order to eliminate this disadvantage vis-à-vis universities and to secure university research in the long term, the Senate of the German Rectors’ Conference recently called for a gradual increase in the program allowance. All new projects would first have to reach at least the level of EU research funding of 25 percent. The goal, he said, must be to achieve full-cost financing by 2020.

According to the HRK, the steady increase in third-party funding (20 percent) coupled with stagnation or shrinkage of basic funding has fundamentally changed the financing structure of universities in recent years. At some universities, third-party funding even accounts for more than one-third of the total financial volume.

Results of the current student survey

The Federal Ministry of Education and Research has published the 12th Student Survey. This is based on a survey of around 5,000 students at 25 universities conducted in the 2012/13 winter semester.

  • Three-quarters of students are satisfied with being a student. Satisfaction levels are similar within all subject groups.
  • At 51 percent, the proportion of female German students at universities has just overtaken the male proportion, so taking up a course of study is not dependent on gender. However, the social background of students still plays a role. Universities are still predominantly attended by students of academic origin (approx. 58 percent). At 37 percent, the rate for universities of applied sciences is significantly lower.
  • Top graders choose primarily medical and science subjects.
  • About 80 percent of students from university bachelor’s programs want to pursue a master’s degree.
  • Students show an aversive attitude toward science and research: For about 35 percent of the students, this area is rather or completely unimportant, another 45 percent meet science and research with indifference.
  • Every second student wants to keep exactly to the standard period of study. On average, the planning of students until graduation is about 1.2 semesters longer than the standard period of study at universities, and about 0.6 semesters longer at universities of applied sciences.
  • The expectations for learning are viewed by students as more appropriate than they were when the 11th Student Survey was conducted. In this context, students from universities of applied sciences confirm significant improvements in terms of work intensity and performance records.
  • The final grade is especially important for students if they already have a clear picture of their career path in mind. Personal development, on the other hand, is not accorded comparable importance.
  • Students confirm a noticeable improvement in the quality of their studies: At universities of applied sciences, 72 percent rate the implementation of courses as “good” or “very good,” while at universities, the figure is 63 percent.

Aline Heurley, KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Düsseldorf

T 0211 4155597-160; aheurley@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Anke Empting, KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Düsseldorf

T 0211 4155597-161; aempting@kpmg-law.com

Julia Paul, KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Düsseldorf

T 0211 4155597-163; juliapaul@kpmg-law.com

Explore #more

06.11.2024 | In the media

Interview in stores + stores magazine on the topic: “Companies need AI rules”

Evaluating application videos using AI, translating employment contracts via smartphone or using AI analyses for target agreements and salary discussions – all of this is…

31.10.2024 | In the media, Legal Financial Services

Statement by Ulrich Keunecke in the in-house counsel on the topic of capital market compliance

For private equity investors, going public is the most common exit strategy when investing in a company.
However, family businesses and SMEs can also gain…

30.10.2024 | In the media

Guest article in ZURe on the topic of reporting channels under the Whistleblower Protection Act and the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act

The dual obligation to implement reporting channels in accordance with the HinSchG and LkSG poses major personnel and administrative challenges for practitioners, especially in times…

25.10.2024 | In the media

Guest article in the Audit Committee Quarterly: New regulations on the remuneration of works councils

On June 28, 2024, the German Bundestag passed the Second Act Amending the Works Constitution Act (BetrVG). This amendment is intended to increase legal certainty…

23.10.2024 | In the media

Guest article in the Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht: Update Gesellschafterdarlehen: Risks in M&A transactions

Christian Hensel and Daniel Dörstling have published a new article on the insolvency-proof handling of shareholder loans in the context of M&A transactions in the…

21.10.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

EU deforestation regulation forces companies to act

Anyone who trades in or uses the raw materials soy, oil palm, cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber and wood and certain products made from them should…

18.10.2024 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises Adiuva Capital on the acquisition of a majority stake in Advellence Solutions AG and Sharedien AG

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH and KPMG Law Switzerland (KPMG Law) advised the owner-managed investment company Adiuva Capital GmbH (Adiuva) on the due diligence, structuring and…

18.10.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

BAG: Showering can be working time

Can showering be working time? The Federal Labor Court had to decide on this question (BAG, judgment of April 23, 2024 – 5 AZR 212/23

11.10.2024 |

Deforestation regulation: The most common mistakes made by companies

The very name of the regulation is misleading. “Deforestation Ordinance” sounds more like a set of rules for agriculture or forestry. But it…

11.10.2024 | In the media

Guest article in the Asset Management Guide 2024: The Fund Market Strengthening Act – Flexibilization and Debt Fund reloaded

On August 5, 2024, the Federal Ministry of Finance published the draft bill for the Act to Strengthen the German Fund Market and Implement Directive…

Contact

Mathias Oberndörfer

Geschäftsführer
Bereichsvorstand Öffentlicher Sektor KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Theodor-Heuss-Straße 5
70174 Stuttgart

Tel.: +49 711 781923410
moberndoerfer@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll